forked from git/git
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add range-diff
, a tbdiff
lookalike
#1
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
An error occurred while submitting: Error: Branch f8c4e30c63bbfa7efec44ff0f6d0404326723d35 is not rebased to upstream/master |
dscho
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2018
Change "fetch" to treat "+" in refspecs (aka --force) to mean we should clobber a local tag of the same name. This changes the long-standing behavior of "fetch" added in 853a369 ("[PATCH] Multi-head fetch.", 2005-08-20), before this change all tag fetches effectively had --force enabled. The original rationale in that change was: > Tags need not be pointing at commits so there is no way to > guarantee "fast-forward" anyway. That comment and the rest of the history of "fetch" shows that the "+" (--force) part of refpecs was only conceived for branch updates, while tags have accepted any changes from upstream unconditionally and clobbered the local tag object. Changing this behavior has been discussed as early as 2011[1]. I the current behavior doesn't make sense, it easily results in local tags accidentally being clobbered. Ideally we'd namespace our tags per-remote, but as with my 97716d2 ("fetch: add a --prune-tags option and fetch.pruneTags config", 2018-02-09) it's easier to work around the current implementation than to fix the root cause, so this implements suggestion #1 from [1], "fetch" now only clobbers the tag if either "+" is provided as part of the refspec, or if "--force" is provided on the command-line. This also makes it nicely symmetrical with how "tag" itself works. We'll now refuse to clobber any existing tags unless "--force" is supplied, whether that clobbering would happen by clobbering a local tag with "tag", or by fetching it from the remote with "fetch". It's still not at all nicely symmetrical with how "git push" works, as discussed in the updated pull-fetch-param.txt documentation, but this change brings them more into line with one another. I don't think there's any reason "fetch" couldn't fully converge with the behavior used by "push", but that's a topic for another change. One of the tests added in 31b808a ("clone --single: limit the fetch refspec to fetched branch", 2012-09-20) is being changed to use --force where a clone would clobber a tag. This changes nothing about the existing behavior of the test. 1. https://public-inbox.org/git/20111123221658.GA22313@sigill.intra.peff.net/ Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
dscho
force-pushed
the
branch-diff
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 30, 2018 21:36
79ce337
to
4a68b95
Compare
/submit |
An error occurred while submitting: Error: git tag -F - -a pr-1/dscho/branch-diff-v3 4a68b95 failed: 128, |
/submit |
Submitted as pull.1.v3.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com |
dscho
force-pushed
the
branch-diff
branch
3 times, most recently
from
July 9, 2018 20:39
ebf3fea
to
d4e27c6
Compare
dscho
force-pushed
the
branch-diff
branch
4 times, most recently
from
July 21, 2018 21:40
5a2cf0c
to
d8498fb
Compare
/submit |
Submitted as pull.1.v4.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com |
dscho
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2023
Signed-off-by: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Reviewed-by: 依云 <lilydjwg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: pan93412 <pan93412@gmail.com> Reviewed0by: Fangyi Zhou <me@fangyi.io>
dscho
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2023
* 'tl/zh_CN_2.41.0_rnd1' of github.com:dyrone/git: l10n: zh_CN: Git 2.41.0 round #1
dscho
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2023
l10n-2.41.0-2 * tag 'l10n-2.41.0-2' of https://github.com/git-l10n/git-po: l10n: zh_TW.po: Git 2.41.0 l10n: sv.po: Update Swedish translation (5515t0f0u) l10n: Update Catalan translation l10n: Update German translation l10n: po-id for 2.41 (round 1) l10n: Update Catalan translation l10n: tr: Update Turkish translations for 2.41.0 l10n: fr.po v2.41.0 rnd2 l10n: fr.po v2.41.0 rnd1 l10n: fr: fix translation of stash save help l10n: zh_CN: Git 2.41.0 round #1 l10n: bg.po: Updated Bulgarian translation (5515t) l10n: update uk localization l10n: uk: remove stale lines l10n: uk: add initial translation l10n: TEAMS: Update pt_PT repo link
dscho
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2023
When "update-index --unresolve $path" cannot find the resolve-undo record for the path the user requested to unresolve, it stuffs the blobs from HEAD and MERGE_HEAD to stage #2 and stage #3 as a fallback. For this reason, the operation does not even start unless both "HEAD" and "MERGE_HEAD" exist. This is suboptimal in a few ways: * It does not recreate stage #1. Even though it is a correct design decision not to do so (because it is impossible to recreate in general cases, without knowing how we got there, including what merge strategy was used), it is much less useful not to have that information in the index. * It limits the "unresolve" operation only during a conflicted "git merge" and nothing else. Other operations like "rebase", "cherry-pick", and "switch -m" may result in conflicts, and the user may want to unresolve the conflict that they incorrectly resolved in order to redo the resolution, but the fallback would not kick in. * Most importantly, the entire "unresolve" operation is disabled after a conflicted merge is committed and MERGE_HEAD is removed, even though the index has perfectly usable resolve-undo records. By lazily reading the HEAD and MERGE_HEAD only when we need to go to the fallback codepath, we will allow cases where resolve-undo records are available (which is 100% of the time, unless the user is reading from an index file created by Git more than 10 years ago) to proceed even after a conflicted merge was committed, during other mergy operations that do not use MERGE_HEAD, or after the result of such mergy operations has been committed. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
dscho
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2023
When "update-index --unresolve $path" cannot find the resolve-undo record for the path the user requested to unresolve, it stuffs the blobs from HEAD and MERGE_HEAD to stage #2 and stage #3 as a fallback. For this reason, the operation does not even start unless both "HEAD" and "MERGE_HEAD" exist. This is suboptimal in a few ways: * It does not recreate stage #1. Even though it is a correct design decision not to do so (because it is impossible to recreate in general cases, without knowing how we got there, including what merge strategy was used), it is much less useful not to have that information in the index. * It limits the "unresolve" operation only during a conflicted "git merge" and nothing else. Other operations like "rebase", "cherry-pick", and "switch -m" may result in conflicts, and the user may want to unresolve the conflict that they incorrectly resolved in order to redo the resolution, but the fallback would not kick in. * Most importantly, the entire "unresolve" operation is disabled after a conflicted merge is committed and MERGE_HEAD is removed, even though the index has perfectly usable resolve-undo records. By lazily reading the HEAD and MERGE_HEAD only when we need to go to the fallback codepath, we will allow cases where resolve-undo records are available (which is 100% of the time, unless the user is reading from an index file created by Git more than 10 years ago) to proceed even after a conflicted merge was committed, during other mergy operations that do not use MERGE_HEAD, or after the result of such mergy operations has been committed. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
dscho
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
When t5583-push-branches.sh was originally introduced via 425b4d7 (push: introduce '--branches' option, 2023-05-06), it was not leak-free. In fact, the test did not even run correctly until 022fbb6 (t5583: fix shebang line, 2023-05-12), but after applying that patch, we see a failure at t5583.8: ==2529087==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 384 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fb536330986 in __interceptor_realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98 #1 0x55e07606cbf9 in xrealloc wrapper.c:140 #2 0x55e075fb6cb3 in prio_queue_put prio-queue.c:42 #3 0x55e075ec81cb in get_reachable_subset commit-reach.c:917 #4 0x55e075fe9cce in add_missing_tags remote.c:1518 #5 0x55e075fea1e4 in match_push_refs remote.c:1665 #6 0x55e076050a8e in transport_push transport.c:1378 #7 0x55e075e2eb74 in push_with_options builtin/push.c:401 #8 0x55e075e2edb0 in do_push builtin/push.c:458 #9 0x55e075e2ff7a in cmd_push builtin/push.c:702 #10 0x55e075d8aaf0 in run_builtin git.c:452 #11 0x55e075d8af08 in handle_builtin git.c:706 #12 0x55e075d8b12c in run_argv git.c:770 #13 0x55e075d8b6a0 in cmd_main git.c:905 #14 0x55e075e81f07 in main common-main.c:60 #15 0x7fb5360ab6c9 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 #16 0x7fb5360ab784 in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360 #17 0x55e075d88f40 in _start (git+0x1ff40) (BuildId: 38ad998b85a535e786129979443630d025ec2453) SUMMARY: LeakSanitizer: 384 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s). This leak was addressed independently via 68b5117 (commit-reach: fix memory leak in get_reachable_subset(), 2023-06-03), which makes t5583 leak-free. But t5583 was not in the tree when 68b5117 was written, and the two only met after the latter was merged back in via 693bde4 (Merge branch 'mh/commit-reach-get-reachable-plug-leak', 2023-06-20). At that point, t5583 was leak-free. Let's mark it as such accordingly. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
dscho
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2023
When t5583-push-branches.sh was originally introduced via 425b4d7 (push: introduce '--branches' option, 2023-05-06), it was not leak-free. In fact, the test did not even run correctly until 022fbb6 (t5583: fix shebang line, 2023-05-12), but after applying that patch, we see a failure at t5583.8: ==2529087==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 384 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fb536330986 in __interceptor_realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98 #1 0x55e07606cbf9 in xrealloc wrapper.c:140 #2 0x55e075fb6cb3 in prio_queue_put prio-queue.c:42 #3 0x55e075ec81cb in get_reachable_subset commit-reach.c:917 #4 0x55e075fe9cce in add_missing_tags remote.c:1518 #5 0x55e075fea1e4 in match_push_refs remote.c:1665 #6 0x55e076050a8e in transport_push transport.c:1378 #7 0x55e075e2eb74 in push_with_options builtin/push.c:401 #8 0x55e075e2edb0 in do_push builtin/push.c:458 #9 0x55e075e2ff7a in cmd_push builtin/push.c:702 #10 0x55e075d8aaf0 in run_builtin git.c:452 #11 0x55e075d8af08 in handle_builtin git.c:706 #12 0x55e075d8b12c in run_argv git.c:770 #13 0x55e075d8b6a0 in cmd_main git.c:905 #14 0x55e075e81f07 in main common-main.c:60 #15 0x7fb5360ab6c9 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 #16 0x7fb5360ab784 in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360 #17 0x55e075d88f40 in _start (git+0x1ff40) (BuildId: 38ad998b85a535e786129979443630d025ec2453) SUMMARY: LeakSanitizer: 384 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s). This leak was addressed independently via 68b5117 (commit-reach: fix memory leak in get_reachable_subset(), 2023-06-03), which makes t5583 leak-free. But t5583 was not in the tree when 68b5117 was written, and the two only met after the latter was merged back in via 693bde4 (Merge branch 'mh/commit-reach-get-reachable-plug-leak', 2023-06-20). At that point, t5583 was leak-free. Let's mark it as such accordingly. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitgitgadget bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2023
It is tempting to think of "files and directories" of the current directory as valid inputs to the add and set subcommands of git sparse-checkout. However, in non-cone mode, they often aren't and using them as potential completions leads to *many* forms of confusion: Issue #1. It provides the *wrong* files and directories. For git sparse-checkout add we always want to add files and directories not currently in our sparse checkout, which means we want file and directories not currently present in the current working tree. Providing the files and directories currently present is thus always wrong. For git sparse-checkout set we have a similar problem except in the subset of cases where we are trying to narrow our checkout to a strict subset of what we already have. That is not a very common scenario, especially since it often does not even happen to be true for the first use of the command; for years we required users to create a sparse-checkout via git sparse-checkout init git sparse-checkout set <args...> (or use a clone option that did the init step for you at clone time). The init command creates a minimal sparse-checkout with just the top-level directory present, meaning the set command has to be used to expand the checkout. Thus, only in a special and perhaps unusual cases would any of the suggestions from normal file and directory completion be appropriate. Issue #2: Suggesting patterns that lead to warnings is unfriendly. If the user specifies any regular file and omits the leading '/', then the sparse-checkout command will warn the user that their command is problematic and suggest they use a leading slash instead. Issue #3: Completion gets confused by leading '/', and provides wrong paths. Users often want to anchor their patterns to the toplevel of the repository, especially when listing individual files. There are a number of reasons for this, but notably even sparse-checkout encourages them to do so (as noted above). However, if users do so (via adding a leading '/' to their pattern), then bash completion will interpret the leading slash not as a request for a path at the toplevel of the repository, but as a request for a path at the root of the filesytem. That means at best that completion cannot help with such paths, and if it does find any completions, they are almost guaranteed to be wrong. Issue #4: Suggesting invalid patterns from subdirectories is unfriendly. There is no per-directory equivalent to .gitignore with sparse-checkouts. There is only a single worktree-global $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout file. As such, paths to files must be specified relative to the toplevel of a repository. Providing suggestions of paths that are relative to the current working directory, as bash completion defaults to, is wrong when the current working directory is not the worktree toplevel directory. Issue #5: Paths with special characters will be interpreted incorrectly The entries in the sparse-checkout file are patterns, not paths. While most paths also qualify as patterns (though even in such cases it would be better for users to not use them directly but prefix them with a leading '/'), there are a variety of special characters that would need special escaping beyond the normal shell escaping: '*', '?', '\', '[', ']', and any leading '#' or '!'. If completion suggests any such paths, users will likely expect them to be treated as an exact path rather than as a pattern that might match some number of files other than 1. Because of the combination of the above issues, turn completion off for the `set` and `add` subcommands of `sparse-checkout` when in non-cone mode, but leave a NEEDSWORK comment specifying what could theoretically be done if someone wanted to provide completion rules that were more helpful than harmful. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitgitgadget bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2023
It is tempting to think of "files and directories" of the current directory as valid inputs to the add and set subcommands of git sparse-checkout. However, in non-cone mode, they often aren't and using them as potential completions leads to *many* forms of confusion: Issue #1. It provides the *wrong* files and directories. For git sparse-checkout add we always want to add files and directories not currently in our sparse checkout, which means we want file and directories not currently present in the current working tree. Providing the files and directories currently present is thus always wrong. For git sparse-checkout set we have a similar problem except in the subset of cases where we are trying to narrow our checkout to a strict subset of what we already have. That is not a very common scenario, especially since it often does not even happen to be true for the first use of the command; for years we required users to create a sparse-checkout via git sparse-checkout init git sparse-checkout set <args...> (or use a clone option that did the init step for you at clone time). The init command creates a minimal sparse-checkout with just the top-level directory present, meaning the set command has to be used to expand the checkout. Thus, only in a special and perhaps unusual cases would any of the suggestions from normal file and directory completion be appropriate. Issue #2: Suggesting patterns that lead to warnings is unfriendly. If the user specifies any regular file and omits the leading '/', then the sparse-checkout command will warn the user that their command is problematic and suggest they use a leading slash instead. Issue #3: Completion gets confused by leading '/', and provides wrong paths. Users often want to anchor their patterns to the toplevel of the repository, especially when listing individual files. There are a number of reasons for this, but notably even sparse-checkout encourages them to do so (as noted above). However, if users do so (via adding a leading '/' to their pattern), then bash completion will interpret the leading slash not as a request for a path at the toplevel of the repository, but as a request for a path at the root of the filesytem. That means at best that completion cannot help with such paths, and if it does find any completions, they are almost guaranteed to be wrong. Issue #4: Suggesting invalid patterns from subdirectories is unfriendly. There is no per-directory equivalent to .gitignore with sparse-checkouts. There is only a single worktree-global $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout file. As such, paths to files must be specified relative to the toplevel of a repository. Providing suggestions of paths that are relative to the current working directory, as bash completion defaults to, is wrong when the current working directory is not the worktree toplevel directory. Issue #5: Paths with special characters will be interpreted incorrectly The entries in the sparse-checkout file are patterns, not paths. While most paths also qualify as patterns (though even in such cases it would be better for users to not use them directly but prefix them with a leading '/'), there are a variety of special characters that would need special escaping beyond the normal shell escaping: '*', '?', '\', '[', ']', and any leading '#' or '!'. If completion suggests any such paths, users will likely expect them to be treated as an exact path rather than as a pattern that might match some number of files other than 1. Because of the combination of the above issues, turn completion off for the `set` and `add` subcommands of `sparse-checkout` when in non-cone mode, but leave a NEEDSWORK comment specifying what could theoretically be done if someone wanted to provide completion rules that were more helpful than harmful. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitgitgadget bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2023
It is tempting to think of "files and directories" of the current directory as valid inputs to the add and set subcommands of git sparse-checkout. However, in non-cone mode, they often aren't and using them as potential completions leads to *many* forms of confusion: Issue #1. It provides the *wrong* files and directories. For git sparse-checkout add we always want to add files and directories not currently in our sparse checkout, which means we want file and directories not currently present in the current working tree. Providing the files and directories currently present is thus always wrong. For git sparse-checkout set we have a similar problem except in the subset of cases where we are trying to narrow our checkout to a strict subset of what we already have. That is not a very common scenario, especially since it often does not even happen to be true for the first use of the command; for years we required users to create a sparse-checkout via git sparse-checkout init git sparse-checkout set <args...> (or use a clone option that did the init step for you at clone time). The init command creates a minimal sparse-checkout with just the top-level directory present, meaning the set command has to be used to expand the checkout. Thus, only in a special and perhaps unusual cases would any of the suggestions from normal file and directory completion be appropriate. Issue #2: Suggesting patterns that lead to warnings is unfriendly. If the user specifies any regular file and omits the leading '/', then the sparse-checkout command will warn the user that their command is problematic and suggest they use a leading slash instead. Issue #3: Completion gets confused by leading '/', and provides wrong paths. Users often want to anchor their patterns to the toplevel of the repository, especially when listing individual files. There are a number of reasons for this, but notably even sparse-checkout encourages them to do so (as noted above). However, if users do so (via adding a leading '/' to their pattern), then bash completion will interpret the leading slash not as a request for a path at the toplevel of the repository, but as a request for a path at the root of the filesytem. That means at best that completion cannot help with such paths, and if it does find any completions, they are almost guaranteed to be wrong. Issue #4: Suggesting invalid patterns from subdirectories is unfriendly. There is no per-directory equivalent to .gitignore with sparse-checkouts. There is only a single worktree-global $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout file. As such, paths to files must be specified relative to the toplevel of a repository. Providing suggestions of paths that are relative to the current working directory, as bash completion defaults to, is wrong when the current working directory is not the worktree toplevel directory. Issue #5: Paths with special characters will be interpreted incorrectly The entries in the sparse-checkout file are patterns, not paths. While most paths also qualify as patterns (though even in such cases it would be better for users to not use them directly but prefix them with a leading '/'), there are a variety of special characters that would need special escaping beyond the normal shell escaping: '*', '?', '\', '[', ']', and any leading '#' or '!'. If completion suggests any such paths, users will likely expect them to be treated as an exact path rather than as a pattern that might match some number of files other than 1. However, despite the first four issues, we can note that _if_ users are using tab completion, then they are probably trying to specify a path in the index. As such, we transform their argument into a top-level-rooted pattern that matches such a file. For example, if they type: git sparse-checkout add Make<TAB> we could "complete" to git sparse-checkout add /Makefile or, if they ran from the Documentation/technical/ subdirectory: git sparse-checkout add m<TAB> we could "complete" it to: git sparse-checkout add /Documentation/technical/multi-pack-index.txt Note in both cases I use "complete" in quotes, because we actually add characters both before and after the argument in question, so we are kind of abusing "bash completions" to be "bash completions AND beginnings". The fifth issue is a bit stickier, especially when you consider that we not only need to deal with escaping issues because of special meanings of patterns in sparse-checkout & gitignore files, but also that we need to consider escaping issues due to ls-files needing to sometimes quote or escape characters, and because the shell needs to escape some characters. The multiple interacting forms of escaping could get ugly; this patch makes no attempt to do so and simply documents that we decided to not deal with those corner cases for now but at least get the common cases right. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitgitgadget bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2023
When reusing objects from a pack, we keep track of a set of one or more `reused_chunk`s, corresponding to sections of one or more object(s) from a source pack that we are reusing. Each chunk contains two pieces of information: - the offset of the first object in the source pack (relative to the beginning of the source pack) - the difference between that offset, and the corresponding offset in the pack we're generating The purpose of keeping track of these is so that we can patch an OFS_DELTAs that cross over a section of the reuse pack that we didn't take. For instance, consider a hypothetical pack as shown below: (chunk #2) __________... / / +--------+---------+-------------------+---------+ ... | <base> | <other> | (unused) | <delta> | ... +--------+---------+-------------------+---------+ \ / \______________/ (chunk #1) Suppose that we are sending objects "base", "other", and "delta", and that the "delta" object is stored as an OFS_DELTA, and that its base is "base". If we don't send any objects in the "(unused)" range, we can't copy the delta'd object directly, since its delta offset includes a range of the pack that we didn't copy, so we have to account for that difference when patching and reassembling the delta. In order to compute this value correctly, we need to know not only where we are in the packfile we're assembling (with `hashfile_total(f)`) but also the position of the first byte of the packfile that we are currently reusing. Currently, this works just fine, since when reusing only a single pack those two values are always identical (because verbatim reuse is the first thing pack-objects does when enabled after writing the pack header). But when reusing multiple packs which have one or more gaps, we'll need to account for these two values diverging. Together, these two allow us to compute the reused chunk's offset difference relative to the start of the reused pack, as desired. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitgitgadget bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
The t5309 script triggers a racy false positive with SANITIZE=leak on a multi-core system. Running with "--stress --run=6" usually fails within 10 seconds or so for me, complaining with something like: + git index-pack --fix-thin --stdin fatal: REF_DELTA at offset 46 already resolved (duplicate base 01d7713666f4de822776c7622c10f1b07de280dc?) ================================================================= ==3904583==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 32 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fa790d01986 in __interceptor_realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98 #1 0x7fa790add769 in __pthread_getattr_np nptl/pthread_getattr_np.c:180 #2 0x7fa790d117c5 in __sanitizer::GetThreadStackTopAndBottom(bool, unsigned long*, unsigned long*) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:150 #3 0x7fa790d11957 in __sanitizer::GetThreadStackAndTls(bool, unsigned long*, unsigned long*, unsigned long*, unsigned long*) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:598 #4 0x7fa790d03fe8 in __lsan::ThreadStart(unsigned int, unsigned long long, __sanitizer::ThreadType) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_posix.cpp:51 #5 0x7fa790d013fd in __lsan_thread_start_func ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:440 #6 0x7fa790adc3eb in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:444 #7 0x7fa790b5ca5b in clone3 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:81 SUMMARY: LeakSanitizer: 32 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s). Aborted What happens is this: 0. We construct a bogus pack with a duplicate object in it and trigger index-pack. 1. We spawn a bunch of worker threads to resolve deltas (on my system it is 16 threads). 2. One of the threads sees the duplicate object and bails by calling exit(), taking down all of the threads. This is expected and is the point of the test. 3. At the time exit() is called, we may still be spawning threads from the main process via pthread_create(). LSan hooks thread creation to update its book-keeping; it has to know where each thread's stack is (so it can find entry points for reachable memory). So it calls pthread_getattr_np() to get information about the new thread. That may allocate memory that must be freed with a matching call to pthread_attr_destroy(). Probably LSan does that immediately, but if you're unlucky enough, the exit() will happen while it's between those two calls, and the allocated pthread_attr_t appears as a leak. This isn't a real leak. It's not even in our code, but rather in the LSan instrumentation code. So we could just ignore it. But the false positive can cause people to waste time tracking it down. It's possibly something that LSan could protect against (e.g., cover the getattr/destroy pair with a mutex, and then in the final post-exit() check for leaks try to take the same mutex). But I don't know enough about LSan to say if that's a reasonable approach or not (or if my analysis is even completely correct). In the meantime, it's pretty easy to avoid the race by making creation of the worker threads "atomic". That is, we'll spawn all of them before letting any of them start to work. That's easy to do because we already have a work_lock() mutex for handing out that work. If the main process takes it, then all of the threads will immediately block until we've finished spawning and released it. This shouldn't make any practical difference for non-LSan runs. The thread spawning is quick, and could happen before any worker thread gets scheduled anyway. Probably other spots that use threads are subject to the same issues. But since we have to manually insert locking (and since this really is kind of a hack), let's not bother with them unless somebody experiences a similar racy false-positive in practice. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The incredibly useful
git-tbdiff
tool to compare patch series (say, to see what changed between two iterations sent to the Git mailing list) is slightly less useful for this developer due to the fact that it requires thehungarian
andnumpy
Python packages which are for some reason really hard to build in MSYS2. So hard that I even had to give up, because it was simply easier to re-implement the whole shebang as a builtin command.The project at https://github.com/trast/tbdiff seems to be dormant, anyway. Funny (and true) story: I looked at the open Pull Requests to see how active that project is, only to find to my surprise that I had submitted one in August 2015, and that it was still unanswered let alone merged.
While at it, I forward-ported AEvar's patch to force
--decorate=no
becausegit -p tbdiff
would fail otherwise.Side note: I work on implementing range-diff not only to make life easier for reviewers who have to suffer through v2, v3, ... of my patch series, but also to verify my changes before submitting a new iteration. And also, maybe even more importantly, I plan to use it to verify my merging-rebases of Git for
Windows (for which I previously used to redirect the pre-rebase/post-rebase diffs vs upstream and then compare them using
git diff --no-index
). And of course any interested person can see what changes were necessary e.g. in the merging-rebase of Git for Windows onto v2.17.0 by running a command like:The command uses what it calls the "dual color mode" (can be disabled via
--no-dual-color
) which helps identifying what actually changed: it prefixes lines with a-
(and red background) that correspond to the first commit range, and with a+
(and green background) that correspond to the second range. The rest of the lines will be colored according to the original diffs.Changes since v4:
linear-assignment.h
to reflect the new name (instead of the old name, which washungarian.h
).range-diff.h
to hide the history of the thrice-renamed command.git range-diff
now also shows the usage.diff_opt_parse()
loop between twoparse_options()
, to make sure that we caught all options, and that the--
separator is handled.lookup_commit_reference()
call to the newestmaster
(it now takes athe_repository
parameter).Changes since v3:
range-diff
now, notbranch-diff
, and--dual-color
is the default).--dual-color
the default.linear-assignment.c
was adjusted to use theSWAP()
macro...
in the 2-parameter invocation, we now exit with the error message.diff_opt_parse()
function is allowed to return a value larger than 1, indicating that more than just one command-line parameter was parsed. We now advance by the indicated value instead of always advancing exactly 1 (which is still correct much of the time).if...else if...else if...else
was simplified (from a logical point of view) by reordering it.static
variabledashes
was turned into a local variable of the caller.git branch --diff
, which has been fixed.--no-dual-color
option.range-diff
command, even if it is populated for real only at a later patch (i.e. at the same time as before).range-diff
to compare an older iteration of a patch series to a newer one: the changes from the previous iteration that were replaced by new ones "fade", while the changes that replace them are "shiny new".Changes since v2:
i
andj
parameters to output_pair_header().--no-patches
option: we inherit diff_options' support for-s
already (and much more)._INV
enum values, and introduced a beautiful GIT_COLOR_REVERSE instead. This way, whatever the user configured as color.diff.new (or .old) will be used in reverse in the dual color mode.--diff
option ofgit branch
. Adjusted pretty much all commit messages to account for this. This change should no longer be visible: see below.four_spaces
.branch --diff
, which had been renamed frombranch-diff
(which was picked to avoid re-usingtbdiff
) torange-diff
.hungarian.c
and its header tolinear-assignment.c
--dual-color
the default, and changed it to still auto-detect whether color should be used rather than forcing it