Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added .rel-files #1042

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2014
Merged

Added .rel-files #1042

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2014

Conversation

stenskjaer
Copy link
Contributor

Reftex adds these for internal processing, only auxillary files for composition and compilation of tex-documents.

Reftex adds these for internal processing, only auxillary files for composition and compilation of tex-documents.
@arcresu
Copy link
Contributor

arcresu commented Apr 16, 2014

Thanks for this! Would this rule perhaps be better off in the TeX.gitignore template instead of the emacs one?

@stenskjaer
Copy link
Contributor Author

I couldn’t really figure it out, because it only applies when you edit tex in Emacs. And I suppose a substantial part of the tex-authors don’t write their documents in Emacs. What do you think?

@arcresu
Copy link
Contributor

arcresu commented Apr 16, 2014

Okay yeah if it's only relevant to Emacs then what you've suggested seems sensible.

arcresu added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2014
Added .rel for reftex to Emacs template
@arcresu arcresu merged commit 8032406 into github:master Apr 16, 2014
@stenskjaer stenskjaer deleted the patch-1 branch April 16, 2014 08:15
drothmaler pushed a commit to drothmaler/gitignore that referenced this pull request May 27, 2014
Added .rel for reftex to Emacs template
u9E9F pushed a commit to u9E9F/gitignore that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2017
Added .rel for reftex to Emacs template
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants