chore(examples): prefer Go and Gno for respective language names

[thehowl]

More on my crusade for right terminology and avoid dooming us to have "gnolang" as the official language name.

See-also #1548

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7382d7c) 55.79% compared to head (cf8ebbd) 56.57%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1607      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.79%   56.57%   +0.78%     
==========================================
  Files         436      438       +2     
  Lines       66168    67094     +926     
==========================================
+ Hits        36917    37961    +1044     
+ Misses      26360    26186     -174     
- Partials     2891     2947      +56     

Flag	Coverage Δ
go-1.21.x	∅ <ø> (∅)
misc	∅ <ø> (∅)
misc-_test.genstd	∅ <ø> (∅)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kristovatlas]

Makes sense to me.

[ccomben]

Does this mean we need to change previous content to reflect this? There are many places where it's written Gnolang (Gno) and we usually have that in the context of... "Gnolang (Gno) is an interpreted and deterministic version of Golang (Go)."

[thehowl]

@ccomben ideally, yes, but I would say to prioritise places which are "timeless" (ie. website and docs) and to work on a best-effort basis for "historical" stuff (ie. blog, old tweets). Of course of the latter the blog is the most important (thank you for creating the issue!).