Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update LICENSE.md #194

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 9, 2022
Merged

Update LICENSE.md #194

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 9, 2022

Conversation

jaekwon
Copy link
Contributor

@jaekwon jaekwon commented May 17, 2022

Updated license.md.
Also published pkgs under Apache2.0.

LICENSE.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
You may keep a copy of this project only for your personal, commercial, and
non-commercial purposes as long as such purposes are not associated with any
religious or distributed ledger (blockchain) subject matter, and the software
is not executed in a replicated environment (e.g. with Tendermint).
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The intent is to restrict gno IP usage until gno.land itself is established, and inter-chain licenses are also established.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise, commercial usage is allowed.

Copy link
Member

@moul moul May 17, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can’t it be a limitation for integration tools, like a client, a dApp, a bridge?

Maybe this license could exclude the .proto and generated protobuf files?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to allow integration tools, clients, dapps, and bridges?
yes I suppose what's missing is carve-ins to allow these, specifically, as long as the software isn't run replicated. Does that sound right?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that’s why I proposed I limit on the interface files if you prefer

but it may be just plain english explaining the limits 👍

@faddat
Copy link
Contributor

faddat commented May 21, 2022

One thing I am not sure of-- with for example the docker stuff I would like to pull in-- it has a prior license.

Thoughts?

@jaekwon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jaekwon commented Jul 9, 2022

Anything that requires its own license could live in its own folder with its own LICENSE.md file.

@jaekwon jaekwon changed the title update license Update LICENSE.md Jul 9, 2022
@jaekwon jaekwon merged commit 315edc6 into master Jul 9, 2022
@jaekwon jaekwon deleted the license branch July 9, 2022 02:44
@moul moul added this to the 🏗2️⃣ test2.gno.land milestone Oct 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants