Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): test start.sh for portal-loop #2064

Open
wants to merge 29 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

albttx
Copy link
Member

@albttx albttx commented May 9, 2024

Contributors' checklist...
  • Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
  • Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
  • Updated the official documentation or not needed
  • No breaking changes were made, or a BREAKING CHANGE: xxx message was included in the description
  • Added references to related issues and PRs
  • Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
  • Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.

@albttx albttx requested review from moul and a team as code owners May 9, 2024 09:36
@albttx albttx requested review from gfanton and removed request for a team May 9, 2024 09:36
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 49.08%. Comparing base (a6cdd8c) to head (6ae19b2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2064      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   49.09%   49.08%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         576      576              
  Lines       77806    77806              
==========================================
- Hits        38202    38192      -10     
- Misses      36510    36519       +9     
- Partials     3094     3095       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
contribs/gnodev 24.18% <ø> (ø)
contribs/gnofaucet 14.46% <ø> (ø)
contribs/gnokeykc 0.00% <ø> (ø)
contribs/gnomd 0.00% <ø> (ø)
gno.land 61.38% <ø> (ø)
gnovm 42.23% <ø> (ø)
misc/autocounterd 0.00% <ø> (ø)
misc/genproto 0.00% <ø> (ø)
misc/genstd 73.90% <ø> (ø)
misc/goscan 0.00% <ø> (ø)
misc/logos 17.68% <ø> (ø)
misc/loop 0.00% <ø> (ø)
tm2 54.49% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@albttx albttx requested a review from a team as a code owner May 11, 2024 00:48
@albttx
Copy link
Member Author

albttx commented May 11, 2024

review is ready @zivkovicmilos :)

Full testing of portal loop :)

.github/workflows/docker.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
misc/loop/traefik/gno.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@albttx
Copy link
Member Author

albttx commented May 12, 2024

Thanks @moul for review, everything is updated + pull origin master --no-rebase

Copy link
Member

@zivkovicmilos zivkovicmilos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check the CI, looks like it's failing on this new portal loop test (due to the latest release changes) 🙏

@@ -1,13 +1,15 @@
name: portal-loop

on:
pull_request: {}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make sure this only runs for master pushes? Or do you think it makes more sense on each PR, given we can always create a tag (release) from a random branch


- name: "Buid new gnolang/gno image"
run: |
docker build -t ghcr.io/gnolang/gno -f Dockerfile.gnoland.release .
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we swapped the name from gnolang/gno to gnolang/gnoland for the chain binary

@@ -46,3 +48,57 @@ jobs:
push: ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request' }}
tags: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }}
labels: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.labels }}

test-portal-loop-docker-compose:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dumb question, but do we need to close the containers somehow in the CI?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Status: In Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants