feat: new govdao pattern with context #2380
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions
bot
added
the
🧾 package/realm
Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
moul
requested review from
jaekwon,
thehowl and
zivkovicmilos
and removed request for
a team
Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
ajnavarro
requested changes
Jul 3, 2024
Co-authored-by: Antonio Navarro Perez <antnavper@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antonio Navarro Perez <antnavper@gmail.com>
|
@ajnavarro, the changes have been applied. |
zivkovicmilos
approved these changes
Jul 4, 2024
This was referenced Jul 4, 2024
zivkovicmilos
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2024
## Description This PR improves the gno implementation of the `valopers` Realm. Waiting on #2380 to add a context-based Govdao pattern before merging. <details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary> - [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible - [x] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory - [x] Updated the official documentation or not needed - [x] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message was included in the description - [x] Added references to related issues and PRs - [ ] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests - [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info [here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md). </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Manfred Touron <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
ajnavarro
reviewed
Jul 8, 2024
ajnavarro
reviewed
Jul 8, 2024
ajnavarro
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces a new pattern for arbitrary govdao proposals using Gno code using contexts. It involves wrapping the provided closure with a system that configures a
context.Contextwith a field indicating that the execution occurs in the context of anapprovedByGovDaoproposal. This opens the door to a new ACL system, not based onPrevRealm(), but on a context-based "certification" system.I believe this pattern makes sense to exist; however, here are some drawbacks I can see:
context.Contextis not yet needed (no goroutine support), and we may eventually never need this package depending on how we implement goroutines internally. (h/t @thehowl)context.Contextis used like an environment variable, which introduces implicitness—something we usually try to avoid to make Gno a very explicit language. Explicitness brings “simplicity” and “verifiability.”contextis to pass it as the first argument. If this becomes more common, it will result in more contracts having exposed functions that are not callable bymaketx call(though they can be called withmaketx runor via an import).Depends on #2379
Related to #2386