Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Could not load libvte-2.91.so on RHEL 7.2 #7

Closed
gnunn1 opened this issue Jan 12, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Could not load libvte-2.91.so on RHEL 7.2 #7

gnunn1 opened this issue Jan 12, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@gnunn1
Copy link
Owner

gnunn1 commented Jan 12, 2016

Currently terminix tries to load the VTE library as libvte-2.91.so which exists on Arch, however on RHEL 7.2 it does not exist. The name should be changed to libvte-2.91.so.0 which exists on both systems.

@alex285
Copy link
Contributor

alex285 commented Jan 12, 2016

It was trying to find libvte2_91.so instead of libvte-2.91.so (rawhide)
So yes that will work in Fedora too

@gnunn1
Copy link
Owner Author

gnunn1 commented Jan 12, 2016

Thanks, I figured that out as well, I just haven't updated this bug yet. I opened issue #141 with GtkD for this so once they fix it I'll close this. In the meantime I patched GtkD locally to use libvte-2.9.1.so.0.

gtkd-developers/GtkD#141

@gnunn1
Copy link
Owner Author

gnunn1 commented Jan 13, 2016

Fixed in GtkD, closing.

@gnunn1 gnunn1 closed this as completed Jan 13, 2016
@alex285
Copy link
Contributor

alex285 commented Jan 22, 2016

GtkD requires beta version of D? (wrong print)
Terminix still pulls the broken version.

@gnunn1
Copy link
Owner Author

gnunn1 commented Jan 22, 2016

I've been using a git version of GtkD to build because they patched a
critical memory issue but hadn't cut a new release. They just released the
new version last night, If you update the version to 3.2.2, without the
commit tag, in dub.json it should work.

I'll test and update it in github in a couple of hours.
On 22 Jan 2016 07:15, "alex285" notifications@github.com wrote:

GtkD requires beta version of D?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#7 (comment).

@alex285
Copy link
Contributor

alex285 commented Jan 22, 2016

yeah noticed the new version after comment. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants