New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Enhancement] Notify reviewer added in pull request via codeowners file #28297
Comments
mg-cloud
added
the
type/proposal
The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
label
Nov 29, 2023
lunny
added a commit
to jpraet/gitea
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2024
…gitea into jpraet-go-gitea#28297-notify-codeowners
This should be considered as a bug but not a proposal. |
lunny
removed
the
type/proposal
The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
label
Mar 17, 2024
lunny
added a commit
to jpraet/gitea
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2024
…gitea into jpraet-go-gitea#28297-notify-codeowners
lunny
added a commit
to jpraet/gitea
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2024
lunny
added a commit
to jpraet/gitea
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2024
DennisRasey
pushed a commit
to DennisRasey/forgejo
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2024
Fixes go-gitea/gitea#28297 This PR also fixed a problem that it needs a database transaction when removing the WIP title. --- Resolves #2771 Also partially ports gitea#29783 (cherry picked from commit 17d7ab5ad4ce3d0fbc1251572c22687c237a30b1)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Feature Description
This could be an enhancement of #24910
This pull request added the neat codeowners feature to automatically add reviewer to pull request upon creation.
However, the reviewer are not notified by email unlike when added manually after the pull request is created.
I didn't find any discussion around that in the parent issue so i dunno if this was done on purpose or if this could be a nice enhancement of this feature.
Screenshots
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: