Add internal-repo octicon for public repos of private org

[CirnoT]

[CirnoT]

Based on GitHub documentation I believe this is correct usage for this octicon (repository within organization that is visible to all organization members with implicit read access)

https://help.github.com/en/github/creating-cloning-and-archiving-repositories/about-repository-visibility#about-internal-repositories

You can use internal repositories to practice "innersource" within your enterprise account. Members of your enterprise account can collaborate using open source methodologies without sharing proprietary information publicly

All enterprise members have read permissions to the internal repository, but internal repositories are not visible to people outside of the enterprise account, including outside collaborators on organization repositories

(enterprise account I believe would translate to organization for us)

As for color; I don't have GitHub Enterprise to compare but based on screenshot available on https://github.blog/2019-11-05-internal-repositories-are-now-generally-available-for-github-enterprise/ the gold color is correct

[silverwind]

Would it make sense to have it as a third repo type (besides public and private)? Seeing the GH screenshot appears they handle it that way.

[CirnoT]

GH has no concept of organization visibility, while we do. For GH it is third repo type, for us it is combination of private organization and public repository.

We could of course add a visual third type on repo page, but it would be essentially same as public and work only within private repository.

[guillep2k]

How does it look along with a repository avatar? My company uses avatars for each repository for quick identifying (e.g. firmware, tools, front-end, etc.)

[CirnoT]

Same as any other icon, like private/public. If i recall correctly from looking at the code, the avatar always takes priority.