Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Permalinkable Content-Addressing for IPFS #8281

Closed
onedrawingperday opened this issue Feb 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Permalinkable Content-Addressing for IPFS #8281

onedrawingperday opened this issue Feb 23, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@onedrawingperday
Copy link
Contributor

onedrawingperday commented Feb 23, 2021

I am opening this issue after this forum topic

IPFS is a distributed system for storing and accessing files, websites, applications, and data, that uses a content identifier, or CID, as a label used to point to material in IPFS. Last month the Brave browser became the first browser to integrate the new protocol


Basically this is a feature request about offering Permalinkable Content Addressing through Hugo.

  • Calculate the SHA256 hash (and/or other hash functions) of a content page.
  • Use the generated value as a permalink for a Custom Ouput Format (in this case IPFS)

Currently IPFS documentation recommends that Hugo users set relativeURLS=true and only generate a CID for the folder that contains the data.

This feature would allow for a complete IPFS implementation.

Instead of being location-based, IPFS addresses a file by what's in it, or by its content. The content identifier above is a cryptographic hash of the content at that address. The hash is unique to the content that it came from, even though it may look short compared to the original content. It also allows you to verify that you got what you asked for — bad actors can't just hand you content that doesn't match.

source of quote


More on IPFS
IPFS Documentation
Article from the portal Decrypt.co regarding porting their website to IPFS
IPFS Wikipedia Page

@adrapper
Copy link

Thank you Alexandros, for raising this here. I look forward to seeing developments.

@kallisti5
Copy link

Just a note that this semi-duplicates #7621

@onedrawingperday
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am closing this issue since #7621 is a more comprehensive issue.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 16, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants