Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reflect: let Value.Seq iterate integer conform to the spec #67269

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

qiulaidongfeng
Copy link
Member

See CL 557596, according to the go specification,
the iterated variable type should
be the same as the iterated integer type.

For #66056

@gopherbot
Copy link

This PR (HEAD: 4e8b711) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit Gerrit at https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/584516.

Important tips:

  • Don't comment on this PR. All discussion takes place in Gerrit.
  • You need a Gmail or other Google account to log in to Gerrit.
  • To change your code in response to feedback:
    • Push a new commit to the branch used by your GitHub PR.
    • A new "patch set" will then appear in Gerrit.
    • Respond to each comment by marking as Done in Gerrit if implemented as suggested. You can alternatively write a reply.
    • Critical: you must click the blue Reply button near the top to publish your Gerrit responses.
    • Multiple commits in the PR will be squashed by GerritBot.
  • The title and description of the GitHub PR are used to construct the final commit message.
    • Edit these as needed via the GitHub web interface (not via Gerrit or git).
    • You should word wrap the PR description at ~76 characters unless you need longer lines (e.g., for tables or URLs).
  • See the Sending a change via GitHub and Reviews sections of the Contribution Guide as well as the FAQ for details.

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from qiulaidongfeng:

Patch Set 1: Commit-Queue+1


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 1:

Dry run: CV is trying the patch.

Bot data: {"action":"start","triggered_at":"2024-05-09T13:17:04Z","revision":"d21bca129a9939601e7d86d8846b7300d6b32612"}


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from qiulaidongfeng:

Patch Set 1: -Commit-Queue


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 1:

This CL has passed the run


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 1: LUCI-TryBot-Result+1


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Ian Lance Taylor:

Patch Set 1: Auto-Submit+1 Code-Review+2 Commit-Queue+1

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 1:

Dry run: CV is trying the patch.

Bot data: {"action":"start","triggered_at":"2024-05-09T19:24:13Z","revision":"d21bca129a9939601e7d86d8846b7300d6b32612"}


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Ian Lance Taylor:

Patch Set 1: -Commit-Queue


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 1:

This CL has passed the run


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Cherry Mui:

Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

… spec

See CL 557596,According to the go specification, the iterated variable type should be the same as the iterated integer type.

For golang#66056

Change-Id: I6a19cc211d081ebd8142c5a702601c8b49a6d736
@gopherbot
Copy link

This PR (HEAD: 8f80e40) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit Gerrit at https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/584516.

Important tips:

  • Don't comment on this PR. All discussion takes place in Gerrit.
  • You need a Gmail or other Google account to log in to Gerrit.
  • To change your code in response to feedback:
    • Push a new commit to the branch used by your GitHub PR.
    • A new "patch set" will then appear in Gerrit.
    • Respond to each comment by marking as Done in Gerrit if implemented as suggested. You can alternatively write a reply.
    • Critical: you must click the blue Reply button near the top to publish your Gerrit responses.
    • Multiple commits in the PR will be squashed by GerritBot.
  • The title and description of the GitHub PR are used to construct the final commit message.
    • Edit these as needed via the GitHub web interface (not via Gerrit or git).
    • You should word wrap the PR description at ~76 characters unless you need longer lines (e.g., for tables or URLs).
  • See the Sending a change via GitHub and Reviews sections of the Contribution Guide as well as the FAQ for details.

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from qiulaidongfeng:

Patch Set 2: Commit-Queue+1

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 2:

Dry run: CV is trying the patch.

Bot data: {"action":"start","triggered_at":"2024-05-10T08:39:30Z","revision":"433efed9d0296494bc8a6fdfbd50108252603ec8"}


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from qiulaidongfeng:

Patch Set 2: -Commit-Queue


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 2:

This CL has passed the run


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link

Message from Go LUCI:

Patch Set 2: LUCI-TryBot-Result+1


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/584516.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

gopherbot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
See CL 557596, according to the go specification,
the iterated variable type should
be the same as the iterated integer type.

For #66056

Change-Id: I96c87440328c2c50c40d76ecf2f222a331be1ce9
GitHub-Last-Rev: 8f80e40
GitHub-Pull-Request: #67269
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/584516
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
@gopherbot
Copy link

This PR is being closed because golang.org/cl/584516 has been merged.

@gopherbot gopherbot closed this May 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants