Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

This CL unifies split argument behavior between TfdsDataSource and FunctionDataSource. #283

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

This CL unifies split argument behavior between TfdsDataSource and FunctionDataSource.

Previously, TfdsDataSource can take a dictionary which can map one split name to another, while for FunctionDataSource this is simply ignored.

This CL allows the splits argument of FunctionDataSource to be a dictionary, and if it's a dictionary, it will operate in the same manner as TfdsDataSource.

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Jul 15, 2022

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@copybara-service copybara-service bot force-pushed the test_461219706 branch 2 times, most recently from 96d89bb to 2d034fe Compare July 15, 2022 19:11
…FunctionDataSource.

Previously, TfdsDataSource can take a dictionary which can map one split name to another, while for FunctionDataSource this is simply ignored.

This CL allows the `splits` argument of FunctionDataSource to be a dictionary, and if it's a dictionary, it will operate in the same manner as TfdsDataSource.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 461219706
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants