Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename our type parameter so that we define assertThat(ComparableT actual) instead of assertThat(T actual). #1096

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Rename our type parameter so that we define assertThat(ComparableT actual) instead of assertThat(T actual).

This might be a little silly to wory about, but I think it makes much clearer what the method is for when you're looking at a list of assertThat methods. Compare the Javadoc for Truth.assertThat, which this CL is changing, to the Javadoc for StandardSubjectBuilder.that, which has been using ComparableT for years (for exactly this reason):

(Aside: All the appearances of fully qualified "java.lang.Boolean" and so forth are a shame....)

RELNOTES=n/a

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants