Fix removal of type annotations from derived types in javax.lang.model.util.Types
#301
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![copybara-service[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/44061?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
…el.util.Types` The implementation was bug-compatible with this javac issue [1], which is being fixed in JDK 23. This change updates turbine to match the spec and the upcoming javac behaviour. [1] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8042981 PiperOrigin-RevId: 599172678
copybara-service
bot
force-pushed
the
test_main_598217904
branch
from
db48a22
to
d3b0c98
Compare
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix removal of type annotations from derived types in
javax.lang.model.util.TypesThe implementation was bug-compatible with this javac issue [1], which is being fixed in JDK 23. This change updates turbine to match the spec and the upcoming javac behaviour.
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8042981