Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

structured logging: revise resource type and info retrieval #685

Closed
minherz opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #708
Closed

structured logging: revise resource type and info retrieval #685

minherz opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #708
Assignees
Labels
api: logging Issues related to the googleapis/java-logging API. lang: java Issues specific to Java. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@minherz
Copy link
Contributor

minherz commented Sep 27, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
If not defined, the resource field in LogEntry should be auto-populated when writing log entries to backend

Describe the solution you'd like
Resource type and additional resource metadata should be populated similarly when logged using Logging agent.
The populated metadata labels should be per resource type and adhere to official documentation

@minherz minherz added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. api: logging Issues related to the googleapis/java-logging API. lang: java Issues specific to Java. labels Sep 27, 2021
@minherz minherz self-assigned this Sep 27, 2021
@minherz
Copy link
Contributor Author

minherz commented Sep 27, 2021

Related issues #685, #686, #687, #688, #689, #690, #691

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: logging Issues related to the googleapis/java-logging API. lang: java Issues specific to Java. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
1 participant