This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 13, 2023. It is now read-only.
quickstart sample tests: should run the quickstart failed #565
Assignees
Labels
api: cloudasset
Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-asset API.
flakybot: flaky
Tells the Flaky Bot not to close or comment on this issue.
flakybot: issue
An issue filed by the Flaky Bot. Should not be added manually.
priority: p2
Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.
samples
Issues that are directly related to samples.
type: bug
Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
Comments
flaky-bot
bot
added
flakybot: issue
product-auto-label
bot
added
api: cloudasset
|
Looks like this issue is flaky. 😟 I'm going to leave this open and stop commenting. A human should fix and close this. When run at the same commit (43b8894), this test passed in one build (Build Status, Sponge) and failed in another build (Build Status, Sponge). |
flaky-bot
bot
added
the
flakybot: flaky
SurferJeffAtGoogle
added
priority: p2
SurferJeffAtGoogle
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 27, 2021
Not really sure why the test is flaky. Maybe without the await statement, the process exist before the console is written to. Fixies #565
Merged
JustinBeckwith
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2021
Not really sure why the test is flaky. Maybe without the await statement, the process exist before the console is written to. Fixies #565
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Note: #478 was also for this test, but it was closed more than 10 days ago. So, I didn't mark it flaky.
commit: 43b8894
buildURL: Build Status, Sponge
status: failed
Test output
expected '' to include '//storage.googleapis.com/asset-nodejs-9350d5d8-2440-4222-a8fa-132a22f44991' AssertionError: expected '' to include '//storage.googleapis.com/asset-nodejs-9350d5d8-2440-4222-a8fa-132a22f44991' at Context. (test/sample.test.js:114:12) at processImmediate (internal/timers.js:461:21)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: