Spatial Interdictor QoL and efficiency improvement pass

[Kubius]

[FEAT][QOL][BALANCE]

About the PR

Substantially improves the process of creating spatial interdictors in several key facets.

• Reduces the duration of most action bars during the interdictor assembly process, cutting nine seconds off of the previous total time (pre-engineer training).
• Dramatically reduces the required materials for interdictor phase-control rods. All rods are now standardized to 0.2 MET-2 (from 1), 1 conductor based on tier (previously 2 to 2.5), 0.5 first-layer material (previously 1), and 0.2 second-layer material (previously 0.5).
• Interdictor mainboards are now included with the assembly kit, adding a requirement of 0.4 conductive metal but removing the step where these boards had to be scanned and reverse-engineered to produce more interdictors.
• As mainboards are now included, the interdictor crate now includes three uncharged power cells, as cells are a necessary step in interdictor assembly.

Some associated names, paths and bits of documentation (in-game and out) were changed to more accurately reflect the new state of the assembly process.

This is tagged Balance due to the potential ramifications for severity of random events, should these become popular; my belief is that if Engineers go to the trouble of making a bunch of these things, the protection that's afforded should match their effort (which it probably should after this, as opposed to only giving you patchwork protection unless you're dumping in a colossal amount of minerals).

Why's this needed?

Interdictors in their current state are unduly expensive and tedious to create given their role as a preventative device; improvements to this process should make them a more appealing option for Engineers to pursue.

Changelog

(u)Kubius
(*)Spatial interdictors are now quicker to assemble, require fewer secondary assembly steps and consume much fewer materials.
(+)Spatial interdictor mainboards are now part of the kit created at manufacturers, and no longer need to be separately scanned and reproduced.

[github-actions]

This PR has been inactive for two weeks, and has been automatically marked as stale. This means it is at risk of being auto closed in another week. Please address any outstanding review items and ensure your PR is finished. If you are auto-staled anyway, ask developers if your PR will be merged. Once you have done any of the previous actions then you should request a developer remove the stale label on your PR, to reset the stale timer. If you feel no developer will respond in that time, you may wish to close this PR youself, while you seek developer comment, as you will then be able to reopen the PR yourself.