Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ppc64le support #728

Closed
2 tasks done
sumitd2 opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

ppc64le support #728

sumitd2 opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@sumitd2
Copy link

sumitd2 commented Oct 19, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

ppc64le artifacts are currently not being published to the releases page.

Describe the solution you'd like

We would like to open a PR for ppc64le support.

Describe alternatives you've considered

ppc64le seems to be there already in some source files.

Search

  • I did search for other open and closed issues before opening this.

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

Additional context

Hi team,

I am from the IBM Power (ppc64le) porting team. We would like to open a PR for ppc64le support so that the artifacts are published to the releases page for subsequent releases. I searched through the source files but could not find where to make this change. Can you please help?

Thank you.

@sumitd2 sumitd2 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 19, 2023
@caarlos0
Copy link
Member

caarlos0 commented Dec 7, 2023

once ppc64le gets more popular, sure, right now I'd rather not.

@caarlos0 caarlos0 closed this as completed Dec 7, 2023
@caarlos0 caarlos0 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 7, 2023
@caarlos0 caarlos0 added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Dec 7, 2023
@gerrith3
Copy link

gerrith3 commented Jan 3, 2024

@caarlos0 I'm not sure I understand your comment about "ppc64le getting more popular"? You do realize that most of the world's mid-tier banking systems are built on IBM's Power, as well as major modern retailers use ppc64le daily? Your credit card/debit card and banking transactions most likely all run through Linux on Power and even specifically some of the code for which your project is a dependency? And that's just one or two areas where it is heavily used. I would love to ask you to reconsider because your reasoning seems to be based on a lack of info, as opposed to a technical reason?

@caarlos0
Copy link
Member

caarlos0 commented Jan 3, 2024

sorry, I meant as a CI and/or dev machine...

I'm aware its widely used as servers, but I've never heard of anyone using it as a main machine to work on stuff, or as a CI.

nfpm is a dev tool, you can still package to ppc64 with it, I just don't know why you would do that FROM a ppc64...

@gerrith3
Copy link

gerrith3 commented Jan 3, 2024

We do everything FROM ppc64le. ;) Most of the major banks and customers that use Power have a line drawn between x86-64 server management and ppc64le server management and we are similar for development in that everything we build and ship tends to be build on ppc64le. Why would we need any Intel servers for anything? :)

@gerrith3
Copy link

gerrith3 commented Jan 3, 2024

BTW we do offer free access to ppc64le servers at OSU (https://osuosl.org/services/powerdev/) where it is possible to also set up a CI. Otherwise we offer free credits on travis-ci.org and we are hoping to bring out GitHub Actions support in the next few months.

@caarlos0
Copy link
Member

caarlos0 commented Jan 4, 2024

yes, since you work at ibm on the powerpc team, I would assume you use it all the time...

I think the right question is: is this a real use case (do you actually need/want to use nfpm on powerpc), or is it just part of an effort to package everything to ppc?

@gerrith3
Copy link

gerrith3 commented Jan 4, 2024

We actually use nfpm on pppc64le.

@caarlos0 caarlos0 reopened this Jan 4, 2024
@caarlos0 caarlos0 added this to the 2.36.0 milestone Jan 4, 2024
@caarlos0 caarlos0 removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jan 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants