Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Normalize Adguard's plain cosmetic filters disguised as style-based f…
…ilters Reported by https://github.com/uBlock-user in https://github.com/orgs/uBlockOrigin/teams/ublock-issues-volunteers/discussions/56 For some reasons, many cosmetic filters in Adguard's Annoyance List are plain cosmetic filters disguised as style-based cosmetic filters, and this was breaking uBO's ability to reverse lookup such filters from the logger.
- Loading branch information
e2d1f50
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated to 1.17.5b17 and still no change, I can still reproduce the issue.
e2d1f50
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With different filter?
e2d1f50
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no same filter.
e2d1f50
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You have to force a re-compile of the list (purge, update), or else uBO uses the old compiled version which is what causes the issue.
e2d1f50
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
force update Adguard annoyance list or ALL of them ?
e2d1f50
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nvm, force updating Adguard's Annoyance List did the job.