Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Register implicit capabilities for conflict detection in more cases #11334

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 13, 2019

Conversation

jjohannes
Copy link
Contributor

In general conflict detection for implicit capabilities is skipped
for performance optimization. However, if the corresponding capability
is explicitly declared by another component that was visited before,
we need to do the conflict detection between the component with
the implicit capability and the one visited earlier.

In general conflict detection for implicit capabilities is skipped
for performance optimization. However, if the corresponding capability
is explicitly declared by another component that was visited *before*,
we need to do the conflict detection between the component with
the implicit capability and the one visited earlier.
Copy link
Contributor

@melix melix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change looks good, I hope it will have no big impact on performance...

@jjohannes jjohannes merged commit 50fdf24 into master Nov 13, 2019
@jjohannes jjohannes deleted the jjohannes/capability-conflict-fix branch November 13, 2019 09:30
jjohannes added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2019
…11334)

In general conflict detection for implicit capabilities is skipped
for performance optimization. However, if the corresponding capability
is explicitly declared by another component that was visited *before*,
we need to do the conflict detection between the component with
the implicit capability and the one visited earlier.

See also: #11300
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants