Chore: Remove Form usage from notification policies #81758
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Clarity-89
added
the
no-changelog
Clarity-89
requested review from
gillesdemey,
konrad147 and
soniaAguilarPeiron
and removed request for
a team
41 tasks
# Conflicts: # public/app/features/alerting/unified/components/notification-policies/EditNotificationPolicyForm.tsx
|
@grafana/alerting-frontend could I get a review on this PR? |
yuri-tceretian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2024
* Chore: Replace Form component usage in EditDefaultPolicyForm.tsx * Chore: Replace Form component usage in EditNotificationPolicyForm.tsx * Remove ts-ignore
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is this feature?
Remove the Form component usage from notification policies.
Why do we need this feature?
Part of the Form deprecation epic.
Which issue(s) does this PR fix?:
Part of #81226
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please check that: