Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolution of GRAILS-11583 - removing of web flow param settings #579

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 23, 2015

Conversation

vinod2800
Copy link
Contributor

Prob - While using grails webflow, it's adding additional "execution=e1s1" query string to URL

Resolution - removed "urlAttrs.params = params" mapping ( https://github.com/grails/grails-core/blob/v2.4.4/grails-plugin-gsp/src/main/groovy/org/codehaus/groovy/grails/plugins/web/taglib/ApplicationTagLib.groovy#L363) line as it's duplicate place.
grails-web-flow-plugin 2.1.0 - has code to handle execution=e1s1, parameter if you need to bookmark or share the pages.

Thank You,
Vinod

Remove additional parameters are added for grails web flow
Ideally we need to take out urlAttrs.params = params  from createLink
operation as webFlow plugin already takes care of adding execution
param.
This reverts commit d134872.
Removed duplicate web-flow key mapping attribute from 2.4.x fields in
order to provide options to users for having flexibility to avoid
execution params
@vinod2800 vinod2800 mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2015
@bobbywarner
Copy link
Contributor

@vinod2800 You should squash these commits into one. You can do this for example like this:
git rebase -i HEAD~7

graemerocher added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2015
Resolution of GRAILS-11583 - removing of web flow param settings
@graemerocher graemerocher merged commit 97be2d9 into grails:2.4.x Mar 23, 2015
@Taack
Copy link

Taack commented Mar 31, 2015

g:link event="something" does not carry "execution" parameter anymore... see my comment on commit 5328b20

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants