Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v14] Add access lists, members, and reviews to cache. #36331

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

mdwn
Copy link
Contributor

@mdwn mdwn commented Jan 5, 2024

Backport #36020 to branch/v14

changelog: Access lists and associated resources are now cached, which should significantly reduce the impact of access list calculation.

Access lists, members, and reviews have been added to the cache. To do this,
I have created a simple backend that doesn't perform the validation that is
performed by the main access list backend and only implements a subset of
actions that are needed by the cache.

To support this, I've added in new gRPC methods:
ListAllAccessListMembers and ListAllAccessListReviews. These do not lock
any access lists and additionally do not perform any implicit or dynamic
members, but just simply return the full list of all members and reviews
so that these endpoints can be used to populate the cache.

The general thought here that, since the order of cache events cannot be
guaranteed, we'll rely on the auth server to perform the proper backend
validation and use a simplified backend that simply sees if the items
are present in the cache. If so, we'll return them.

I've had to update a few protos to support this. While I was here, I
fixed a bug in the access list gRPC client where the call tolist of reviews
was not supplying the access list name. Additionally, the user login
state generator will now use the cached access list values.
@mdwn mdwn added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into branch/v14 with commit b5caecb Jan 9, 2024
36 checks passed
@mdwn mdwn deleted the bot/backport-36020-branch/v14 branch January 9, 2024 16:55
@camscale camscale mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants