Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Enable passing boto3 options to TupleS3StoreBackend #1691

Conversation

mgorsk1
Copy link
Contributor

@mgorsk1 mgorsk1 commented Jul 12, 2020

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • optional boto3_options (dictionary) section when configuring TupleS3BackendStore.

After submitting your PR, CI checks will run and @tiny-tim-bot will check for your CLA signature.

For a PR with nontrivial changes, we review with both design-centric and code-centric lenses.

In a design review, we aim to ensure that the PR is consistent with our relationship to the open source community, with our software architecture and abstractions, and with our users' needs and expectations. That review often starts well before a PR, for example in github issues or slack, so please link to relevant conversations in notes below to help reviewers understand and approve your PR more quickly (e.g. closes #123).

Previous Design Review notes:

Thank you for submitting!

@mgorsk1 mgorsk1 marked this pull request as draft July 12, 2020 17:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1691 into develop will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 82.75%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1691      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    77.85%   77.84%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          135      135              
  Lines        15680    15692      +12     
===========================================
+ Hits         12208    12215       +7     
- Misses        3472     3477       +5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
great_expectations/cli/checkpoint.py 95.58% <ø> (ø)
great_expectations/data_context/data_context.py 87.11% <ø> (ø)
...ctations/data_context/store/tuple_store_backend.py 78.61% <82.75%> (+0.16%) ⬆️
...ctations/core/usage_statistics/usage_statistics.py 79.82% <0.00%> (-1.32%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 81f8536...79bd6f7. Read the comment docs.

@mgorsk1 mgorsk1 force-pushed the feature/boto3_options_for_s3_store_backend branch from 9a16e68 to ed628fe Compare July 12, 2020 20:39
@spbail
Copy link
Contributor

spbail commented Feb 2, 2021

@alexsherstinsky Is this related to the boto change you just merged in #2364 ? How should we proceed with this PR here?

alexsherstinsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2021
…toreBackend (Thanks for #1691 to @mgorsk1!) (#2371)

* LINT

* Adding possibility to pass boto3_options to TupleS3StoreBackend -- thanks to PR 1691 by mgorsk1 (Community Contributor).

* PR note in changelog.
@spbail
Copy link
Contributor

spbail commented Feb 2, 2021

Addressed in #2364 and added some more from this PR in #2371 - thanks @mgorsk1 !

@spbail spbail closed this Feb 2, 2021
robertparker pushed a commit to robertparker/great_expectations that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
…toreBackend (Thanks for great-expectations#1691 to @mgorsk1!) (great-expectations#2371)

* LINT

* Adding possibility to pass boto3_options to TupleS3StoreBackend -- thanks to PR 1691 by mgorsk1 (Community Contributor).

* PR note in changelog.
alexsherstinsky added a commit to alexsherstinsky/great_expectations that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2021
…toreBackend (Thanks for great-expectations#1691 to @mgorsk1!) (great-expectations#2371)

* LINT

* Adding possibility to pass boto3_options to TupleS3StoreBackend -- thanks to PR 1691 by mgorsk1 (Community Contributor).

* PR note in changelog.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants