[MAINTENANCE] Helpful Message for Expectations that require Metrics that are not available

[Shinnnyshinshin]

Currently, if an Expectation is misconfigured (such as referencing a non-existent column name), we get a cryptic error message.

    provided_metrics: Dict[str, MetricValue] = {
>       metric_name: metrics[metric_configuration.id]
        for metric_name, metric_configuration in validation_dependencies.metric_configurations.items()
    }
E   KeyError: ('column_values.nonnull.unexpected_count', '9fb963653447edb4ae8538917d6915bc', ())

This PR adds a check in expectation.py, where we validate dependencies of the current Expectation against available metrics, and outputs a more helpful error message:

An error message will look something like this:

great_expectations.exceptions.exceptions.InvalidExpectationConfigurationError: Metric ('table.row_count', '7054e9d72e974fad769b0964f41e7e5b', "result_format={'result_format': 'BASIC', 'partial_unexpected_count': 20, 'include_unexpected_rows': False}") is not available for validation of {
                 "expectation_type": "expect_column_values_to_not_be_null",
                 "kwargs": {
                   "column": "I_dont_exist",
                   "batch_id": "projects-projects"
                 },
                 "meta": {}
              }. Please check your configuration.

• Description of PR changes above includes a link to an existing GitHub issue
• PR title is prefixed with one of: [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], [CONTRIB]
• Code is linted - run invoke lint (uses black + ruff)
• Appropriate tests and docs have been updated

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	0e93670
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/654564df3bdcde0008a6e759

[ghost]

👇 Click on the image for a new way to code review

Legend

[JennyTee]

I like the extra error message; that seems much more helpful. Is this the only fix needed for #8619, then? Does this mean that for databases with case-insensitive column names, GX users will need to define expectations with case-sensitive column names?

[anthonyburdi]

Looks great - just wondering about the pythonsqlite.db-journal file added. Could you clarify why that was added?

[anthonyburdi]

Good names make things so much easier ❤️ Thank you for refactoring this.

[anthonyburdi]

Very helpful error message, thanks for this PR!