Best practices in annotating CNVs and fusions alongside variants in knowledgebases #39
Labels
2018
Topics proposed for the 2018 hackathon in San Diego
curation
selected-for-action
Tasks that were selected at the event and have followup attached to the issue
One noted gap in many well-known knowledgebases is the coverage and searchability of copy number variants and fusions/structural variants. Many our our in-house tools are attempting to employ segment/coordinate based searches to link to relevant data/knowledge for clinical reporting of copy number variants. Fusions are another beast for us - each assay seems to annotate things a little differently. For example, are the fusion partners always listed 5' --> 3'? How do we document structural rearrangements (translocations/inversions/CNVs) that result in over/under expression by position effect (i.e. they don't result in a fusion product)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: