Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use $DPKG_OPTIONS everywhere for apt-get/aptitude #8

Closed
adrelanos opened this issue Oct 19, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

Use $DPKG_OPTIONS everywhere for apt-get/aptitude #8

adrelanos opened this issue Oct 19, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@adrelanos
Copy link
Contributor

In File:
https://github.com/grml/grml-debootstrap/blob/master/chroot-script

Could you consider please, searching for apt-get and aptitude and add $DPKG_OPTIONS everywhere?

For example apt-get --force-yes -y upgrade issues network activity, so having $DPKG_OPTIONS around for setting higher timeouts would be helpful. This also goes for apt-get update.

Not sure if $DPKG_OPTIONS is useful for apt-get clean as well, but extra apt options do not hurt and we don't know what options apt gets in future. So adding $DPKG_OPTIONS there wouldn't hurt either.

@formorer
Copy link
Member

On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, adrelanos wrote:

In File:
https://github.com/grml/grml-debootstrap/blob/master/chroot-script

Could you consider please, searching for apt-get and aptitude and add $DPKG_OPTIONS everywhere?

For example apt-get --force-yes -y upgrade issues network activity, so having $DPKG_OPTIONS around for setting higher timeouts would be helpful. This also goes for apt-get update.

Not sure if $DPKG_OPTIONS is useful for apt-get clean as well, but extra apt options do not hurt and we don't know what options apt gets in future. So adding $DPKG_OPTIONS there wouldn't hurt either.
I guess we are happy to accept a patch/pull request for that feature wish.

Alex

@adrelanos
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for merging! Nothing more to do here. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants