Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improvements to Debian packaging targeting unstable #1906

Closed
wants to merge 21 commits into from
Closed

Improvements to Debian packaging targeting unstable #1906

wants to merge 21 commits into from

Conversation

andrewpollock
Copy link

Contributions from Laszlo Boszormenyi, who is the other Debian Developer who was independently working packaging gRPC.

Some cleanup, make rebuildable.

This is for #662

andrewpollock and others added 21 commits May 21, 2015 14:49
@andrewpollock
Initial Debian packaging
902adf5 
Not quite Lintian-clean yet
@andrewpollock
A couple of fixes to placate Lintian
d50fdf6 
- bumped the Standards-Version (no changes required)
- shorted the package synopsis
@andrewpollock
Finalise debian/rules
e8da620 
- reenable tests
- remove unnecessary boilerplate
- enabled hardened build flags
@andrewpollock
Override spurious Lintian erroro
442c45f 
debian/rules is GPL-2, but the rest is BSD, so there's no licensing
issues
@andrewpollock
Temporarily disable due to failing test
17ef242 
chttp2_fake_security_invoke_large_request_test is failing consistently
and I don't know why yet
@andrewpollock
Add uploader and remove unnecessary build-deps
cba1a29 
László is another DD who was independently working on packaging grpc, so
he can pool his efforts here.

Some build-deps were added when I was trying to build protobuf3 from
third_party, but they're not needed
@andrewpollock
Merge branch 'debian/sid' of https://github.com/andrewpollock/grpc in…
ed22b7c 
…to debian/sid
@nicolasnoble
Merge pull request grpc#1733 from andrewpollock/debian/sid
a84c0a0 
First cut of Debian packaging
@gcsideal @andrewpollock
Upstream is version 0.6.0
4088142
@gcsideal @andrewpollock
Use my name without accents
4ed7256
@gcsideal @andrewpollock
Make rebuildable
235592e
@gcsideal @andrewpollock
Make packages distinct
1436c2c
@gcsideal @andrewpollock
Add rules filetype
206a123
@gcsideal @andrewpollock
Only disable tests if asked to
e2fed4b
@gcsideal @andrewpollock
Enable parallel build
d07c4f3
@gcsideal @andrewpollock
Cleanup rules
6690bfe
@andrewpollock
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/debian/sid' into debian/sid
11013dd
@andrewpollock
Fake install upstream missed files
d050950 
Manually cherry-picked from gcsideal's pull request commit
02ba43d
@andrewpollock
Correctly install files for C bindings
dbcafb1 
Manual cherry pick from Laszlo's commit
8e8b191
@andrewpollock
Remove unnecessary manual linking
02a0775 
These don't seem to need to be included, as upstream appears to be doing
the right thing.
@andrewpollock
Merge branch 'master' into debian/sid
d7705a3
@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project, in which case you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify. Thanks.

  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please let us know the company's name.

@nicolasnoble
Copy link
Member

@googlebot everything is okay, don't worry.

@gcsideal
Copy link

gcsideal commented Jun 4, 2015

Just to be extra sure, I've already signed the CLA, please verify.

@tbetbetbe
Copy link
Contributor

Just one minor admin comment. Could you possibly split this into two PRs ?

  • One that just updates the branch from master
  • and a follow-up that contains your changes.

@nicolasnoble
Copy link
Member

Sorry, I didn't spot that I was assigned to this one. And thinking about it, wouldn't it be better to base that from the release-0_9 branch so to truly have a 0.9.1 release ?

@andrewpollock
Copy link
Author

And thinking about it, wouldn't it be better to base that from the release-0_9 branch so to truly have a 0.9.1 release

Okay so bear with me, I'm new to doing collaborative development in Git and using Github.

So are you asking me to merge the release-0_9 into my debian/sid branch and then send a PR from my debian/sid branch into the one on grpc/grpc?

And I presume that means I abandon this PR?

This was referenced Jun 18, 2015
Merged
Merged
@nicolasnoble
Copy link
Member

I'm going to close this one since it's abandoned.

@andrewpollock andrewpollock deleted the debian/sid branch September 9, 2015 04:34
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 30, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@nicolasnoble nicolasnoble

Labels
area/packaging & distribution cla: no
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@andrewpollock @googlebot @nicolasnoble @gcsideal @tbetbetbe