-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
meta.forest; subgroup effect #49
Comments
Felix, It took me some time to look into this. Should be fixed now. Best wishes, |
Thank you again for all your efforts, Guido!
As far as I understand |
Classic mistake - I had the auxiliary functions in other files which I did not upload to the Git repository. I added them to |
Thanks for getting back on this. Works perfectly fine now. Thank you! |
Hi Guido, hi everyone,
thank you for your help and the solution regarding the last issue (#48), and I am really sorry to bother you once again.
Given the previously explored example
metaprop()
works fine, and also estimates of the effect are reported.However,
forest()
does not plot the summary effect per subgroup, regardless how the argumentstype.random
,type.subgroup
ortype.subgroup.random
are defined.Any advices? Wrong configuration at my side, or a structural problem of
forest()
?Sorry once again, and all the best,
Felix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: