-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 342
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add any provided key to lal_pars
for waveform generation
#4728
Open
hoyc1
wants to merge
5
commits into
gwastro:master
Choose a base branch
from
hoyc1:waveform_flags
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can any of the following lines be removed then if this is added? It would seem to serve in large part a similar purpose. Not all of course (modes for example would not work), but some of the nongr params probably could be not explicitly given now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ahnitz, I would need to change the logic to account for the
nongr
params, or potentially deprecate the existingpycbc
names and change them to new names. For example, the currentnongr
params inpycbc
follow the convention e.g.dchi0
but thelalsimulation
function requires them to beNonGRDChi0
. I could removeframe_axis
andmodes_choice
, but they would also need to be removed from thedefault_args
(in order to prevent the issue above).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I don't think we want to change the standardized names. One could remove code duplication with a dict, though, no?
Also, have you checked how slow this procedure is? What sort of overhead does it introduce?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, the LALDict internally uses exactly the same field name as pycbc anyway (https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/lalsuite/-/blob/master/lalsimulation/lib/LALSimInspiralWaveformParams.c#L1326) - it is only the name of the 'Insert' function that is unpredictable.
After importing lalsimulation it is possible to get a mapping from the dictionary key to the Insert function in any case - LVK people can see here how to do that via
dir(lalsimulation)
(it's not anything that should be secret ...)https://git.ligo.org/waveforms/new-waveforms-interface/-/issues/49#note_1028009