Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test testy: Bump specs version and fix specs for current API. #3

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 22, 2016

Conversation

Shadowfiend
Copy link
Member

@Shadowfiend Shadowfiend commented Sep 21, 2016

The specs were a bit outdated, shame on me, but now reflect the current API.
No specs yet for withFields.

Even got travis set up here…

The specs were a bit outdated, shame on me, but now reflect the current API.
No specs yet for withFields or field groups.
We actually now pull this from Lift's implementation, which I fixed when I
actually wrote tests for the thing... When we bump lift-formality to depend on
Lift 3, we'll be able to lean directly on Lift's implementation of HLists
anyway.
These are now SScope and IntFieldScope, keeping with specs2 terminology, and
properly wrap each of the specs that use them individually to provide
isolation (though we could use `isolated` for that as well). All tests pass
now, boom!
@Shadowfiend
Copy link
Member Author

Green light from travis == merging this suckah.

@Shadowfiend Shadowfiend merged commit 7e83384 into master Sep 22, 2016
@Shadowfiend Shadowfiend deleted the testy-testy branch September 22, 2016 01:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant