-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add the format brush extension to the default rich text editor #5603
feat: add the format brush extension to the default rich text editor #5603
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5603 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 56.91% 56.48% -0.44%
- Complexity 3319 3333 +14
============================================
Files 587 598 +11
Lines 18968 19334 +366
Branches 1401 1359 -42
============================================
+ Hits 10795 10920 +125
- Misses 7594 7849 +255
+ Partials 579 565 -14 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
…-editor-format-brush-extension
…-editor-format-brush-extension
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: guqing The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
/area editor
/area ui
What this PR does / why we need it:
为默认富文本编辑器添加格式刷扩展。用以给 text node 复制格式。
使用方式:
Shift + Mod + c
快捷键复制格式。How to test it?
测试格式刷功能是否正常可用。需要测试 text node 以及 block node 内部的 text 格式功能。
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #5591
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?