You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This license looks extremely non-free, and if it's accurate (and not just an outdated EXIF field), the font test/shape/data/in-house/fonts/641ca9d7808b01cafa9a666c13811c9b56eb9c52.ttf should probably be removed from the tree. If the license is different, it would be good to update the EXIF data or mention the file in the in-house directory's COPYING file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The offending font was removed upstream, so we shouldn't need to do
this for the next release: see
harfbuzz#4059 for details.
Otherwise, ran decopy on everything and cleaned up the very messy
results.
While updating copyright info for harfbuzz, I came across the following license in EXIF data.
This license looks extremely non-free, and if it's accurate (and not just an outdated EXIF field), the font test/shape/data/in-house/fonts/641ca9d7808b01cafa9a666c13811c9b56eb9c52.ttf should probably be removed from the tree. If the license is different, it would be good to update the EXIF data or mention the file in the in-house directory's COPYING file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: