Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New resource
azurerm_storage_sync_cloud_endpoint
#8540New resource
azurerm_storage_sync_cloud_endpoint
#8540Changes from 2 commits
ed81898
ff53bdf
cab776d
f016886
64bc87e
d24437e
e6b81bd
cbde352
d85bd12
48f7846
c14ac81
e8df3ce
ff6d843
d26ed4e
4c9d802
54457a2
3e01f74
4a378d9
7f4f738
00684d9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should be catching/raising this error
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we have a validation in the field
storage_sync_group_id
, could we assume that there'll not be errors here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this'll break when not using a Service Principal.. can we instead source this from
meta.(*clients.Client).Account.TenantID
However in practice we should make this field optional/computed and if a user leaves this unspecified default this to their Tenant ID, to allow this to be used across Tenants
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. Previously, I have assumed that there might not be a service principal that could be cross tenant. Anyway, I'll change it back.