Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

state/remote: export ClientLocker, test for implementation #11978

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 15, 2017

Conversation

mitchellh
Copy link
Contributor

This adds unit tests (that will fail at compile time) if various structs
don't implement the right interfaces for locking

This adds unit tests (that will fail at compile time) if various structs
don't implement the right interfaces for locking
Copy link
Member

@jbardin jbardin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤦‍♂️ thanks!

// backend to enable state lock/unlock.
type ClientLocker interface {
Client

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would it make sense to just embed state.Locker?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a fair point since the APIs are the same right now. Will do.

@mitchellh mitchellh merged commit fa2fd0b into master Feb 15, 2017
@mitchellh mitchellh deleted the b-state-locker branch February 15, 2017 22:27
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 16, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@hashicorp hashicorp locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 16, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants