Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for GH-13660 #13686

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Fix for GH-13660 #13686

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

brandontosch
Copy link
Contributor

@brandontosch brandontosch commented Apr 15, 2017

For issue #13660. Fixed logic to allow attaching disks to VMs using vhd_uri as the source. Also added a new test for attaching storage blobs to VMs since that was missing.

@pearcec
Copy link
Contributor

pearcec commented Jun 2, 2017

So your fix only focuses on the data disk? I am working through a different issue on the os_disk. Wondering should I combine with yours or keep to mine. Thinking I should probably keep with mine.

@brandontosch
Copy link
Contributor Author

brandontosch commented Jun 5, 2017

Hi @pearcec
This was specifically targeted at a bug that affected data disks. Which issue were you working on for os disks? I know there was also an issue with using an image uri with managed disks (#13932) that I was working here #13960. Is there another issue with os disks as well?

@pearcec
Copy link
Contributor

pearcec commented Jun 7, 2017

@brandontosch I handled the issue independent of this one. I ran into the same problem on a fix to attach os_disk. I read through your code for the fix. Thanks. I believe we are good.

@nbering
Copy link

nbering commented Jul 18, 2017

@pearcec Does that mean there's a fix applied somewhere? I need to update a machine that has os disk set to Attach with a VHD. I don't mind checking out a branch, I already build from source locally.

Copy link

@SFerrazLeite SFerrazLeite left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a really minor fix that would have saved us quite a few hours of debugging and research. I didn't checkt the code of the tests, but the changes to the azure vm code are obviously correct. Please, please someone merge.

@privatwolke
Copy link

Fix for this is to brew switch terraform 0.9.2 -- may not be possible if your state was created by a later version of terraform. Please rebase and merge this PR! 🙏

@pearcec
Copy link
Contributor

pearcec commented Sep 13, 2017

@nbering I fixed it for os_disk. It was merged back in June.

Copy link

@privatwolke privatwolke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is still an issue for us which prevents us from switching to a current version of terraform.

@apparentlymart
Copy link
Member

Hello @brandontosch, and thanks for working on this!

As part of the the Terraform 0.10 release earlier this year, all of the Terraform providers were moved to their own repositories in the terraform-providers GitHub organization, and removed from the Terraform Core repository.

Unfortunately due to the fact that new issues and pull requests are being opened constantly, it was not possible for the various provider maintainers to merge all outstanding pull requests before this split, and there is no automatic way to migrate a pull request to a new repository.

As a result, this pull request can sadly no longer be applied as-is, and so I'm going to close it.

If you or someone else has the time and motivation to apply same changes to the azurerm provider repository and open a new PR there, the maintainers of that provider should be able to review and merge it. The issue corresponding to this PR was already migrated as hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#62.

Thanks again for working on this, and sorry it was not able to be merged before the provider repository changes.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 6, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@hashicorp hashicorp locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 6, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants