Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename isManaged and managedNamespaceRoot #26697

Merged

Conversation

Monkeychip
Copy link
Contributor

@Monkeychip Monkeychip commented Apr 30, 2024

isManaged -> isHvdManaged
managedNamespaceRoot -> hvdManagedNamespaceRoot

We decided to rename these to clarify what "managed" means—see original PR discussion.

@Monkeychip Monkeychip added this to the 1.17.0-rc milestone Apr 30, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed label Apr 30, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 30, 2024

CI Results:
All Go tests succeeded! ✅

@Monkeychip Monkeychip marked this pull request as ready for review April 30, 2024 17:32
@Monkeychip Monkeychip requested a review from a team as a code owner April 30, 2024 17:32
Copy link

Build Results:
All builds succeeded! ✅

@Monkeychip Monkeychip requested a review from a team as a code owner April 30, 2024 21:02
Copy link
Contributor

@andaley andaley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code changes look great! i'm curious about the test change -- not sure why it would've come up here in a renaming PR 🤔

@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ module('Acceptance | sync | overview', function (hooks) {
this.server.post('/sys/activation-flags/secrets-sync/activate', (_, req) => {
assert.strictEqual(
req.requestHeaders['X-Vault-Namespace'],
'root',
'Request is made to root namespace'
'admin/foo',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👀 how was this passing before? did we miss it in an earlier pr?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there's something off about this test. I'll add a note to myself to investigate tmrw. But looking at the test it makes sense you'd be in the admin/foo namespace so I have no idea how it passed before. I suspect on your PR you'll hit flakyness with it.

@Monkeychip Monkeychip merged commit 5c1d774 into ui/VAULT-25468/enable-secrets-sync-hvd Apr 30, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
@Monkeychip Monkeychip deleted the ui/VAULT-26568/rename branch April 30, 2024 21:52
andaley pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
* renames

* lowercase HVD to match

* missed some

* test failure
Monkeychip added a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
* Allow Managed clusters to see Secrets Sync Overview and Sidebar nav (#26649)

* update badge text and allow hvd on secrets sync views

* update logic in Secrets Sync overview and cta for hvd.

* spacing

* rearrange based on pr feedback

* fix return on badgeText and cluster nav test

* fix landing cta tests

* update test to reflect new changes

* moved call to feature-flags from application route to the service to match patterns

* add managed test coverage on overview component test and remove premium feature so cta message appplies to both managed and non-managed clusters

* missed service name and unskip admin test

* clean up

* fix tests

* flags test fix

* Rename isManaged and managedNamespaceRoot (#26697)

* renames

* lowercase HVD to match

* missed some

* test failure

* [Secrets Sync] enable access to Sync clients page for HVD clusters (#26713)

* feat: split client counts navbar into separate component

* acceptance/clients/counts/overview-test: remove tests now covered by int tests

* clients counts route: rename isSecretsSyncActivated to showSecretsSync

* sync clients page: show unactivated state unless sync client history or feature is activated

* client counts navbar: show sync tab only if client history or is /able to be/ activated

* clients overview page: only show sync charts if activated

* fix: rename isManaged to isHvd

* acceptance/counts/overview-test: add HVD tests

* acceptance/counts/overview-test: clean up unused cruft

* aceptance/clients/counts/overview-test: ensure we dont get false negatives

* chore: move Clients::Error to Clients::Counts::Error

* chore: calculate showSecretSync in page component instead of route

* chore: add copyright headers

* acceptance/clients/counts/overview-test: stub activated flags to fix test

* [Secrets sync] update sync test selectors (#26824)

* acceptance/clients/counts/overview-test: use imported test selectors

* general-selectors: add missing emptyStateSubtitle property

* acceptance/clients/counts/sync: nest tests in top level module for easier test runs

* Add permissions check to show/hide activate button (#26840)

* add permissions check to flags service and consume in overview template

* add back missing refresh

* fix test failures

* add test coverage

* clean up

* address flaky test

* grr

* address test failures

* add changelog

* try to fix test failure only on gh

* fix fetch to match previous implementation of feature-flags

* fix failing test

* update comment

---------

Co-authored-by: Noelle Daley <noelledaley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: clairebontempo@gmail.com <clairebontempo@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed pr/no-changelog ui
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants