Specify argument names with fun hooks?

[robinp]

Hello. Is it possible to tell the fun hook what name to use on the various generated arguments? Instead of just a1, a2 etc. Thanks!

[RyanGlScott]

Not that I'm aware of, no. Is there a particular reason why you'd need the
arguments to have certain names?
On Apr 18, 2016 2:12 PM, "Robin Palotai" notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello. Is it possible to tell the fun hook what name to use on the various
generated arguments? Instead of just a1, a2 etc. Thanks!

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#163

[robinp]

It would be nicer to read - for example, if there are three Bool arguments, would be nice to give descriptive names to them. Though I found you can put docstrings on the types, which alleviates the problem slightly.

One could argue that the wrapped functions are low-level and probably need a higher level wrapper with proper names - but still feel it would be useful to have descriptive names at the low level too.