Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Predicate should fail when null argument is passed #2577

Closed
pveentjer opened this issue May 29, 2014 · 0 comments
Closed

Predicate should fail when null argument is passed #2577

pveentjer opened this issue May 29, 2014 · 0 comments
Labels
Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee Type: Defect
Milestone

Comments

@pveentjer
Copy link
Contributor

When a predicate is passed a null argument, e.g.

lessThan("bla",null)

It should fail immediately, and not during the execution of the predicate. We want to fail fast.

@gurbuzali gurbuzali added this to the 3.2.3 milestone May 29, 2014
hasancelik pushed a commit to hasancelik/hazelcast that referenced this issue Jun 12, 2014
@mdogan mdogan modified the milestones: 3.2.4, 3.2.3 Jun 13, 2014
hasancelik pushed a commit to hasancelik/hazelcast that referenced this issue Jun 14, 2014
gurbuzali added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2014
fixes #2577 maintenance  implemented testNull() method and added check nullity condition on predicate classes
gurbuzali added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2014
fixes #2577 implemented testNull() method and added check nullity condition on predicate classes
MrEasy pushed a commit to seeburger-ag/hazelcast that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2014
@mmedenjak mmedenjak added the Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee label Jan 28, 2020
devOpsHazelcast pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2024
GitOrigin-RevId: e746e2b16c719cacdac52d3630b29642a0bfceb2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee Type: Defect
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants