Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PartitionIteratingOperation & Backup more detail in diagnostics #8899

Conversation

pveentjer
Copy link
Contributor

If a PartitionIteratingOperation or a Backup is found in the invocations or
in the pending connections, instead of just mentioning the outer classname,
the diagnostics tries to look inside so one can see e.g.
PartitionIteratingOperation(MapSizeFactory) as name.

This gives better insight of the type of operations being encountered.

fix #8855

@pveentjer pveentjer added this to the 3.8 milestone Sep 19, 2016
@pveentjer pveentjer force-pushed the improvement/3.8/8893-partitioniterating-backup-diagnostics-more-detail branch from 9a5db85 to b28d665 Compare September 19, 2016 10:52
If a PartitionIteratingOperation or a Backup is found in the invocations or
in the pending connections, instead of just mentioning the outer classname,
the diagnostics tries to look inside so one can see e.g.
PartitionIteratingOperation(MapSizeFactory) as name.

This gives better insight of the type of operations being encountered.

fix hazelcast#8855
@pveentjer pveentjer force-pushed the improvement/3.8/8893-partitioniterating-backup-diagnostics-more-detail branch from b28d665 to fe75eea Compare September 19, 2016 12:02
@devOpsHazelcast
Copy link
Collaborator

Test PASSed.

@pveentjer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging this one since it is just a debug/diagnostics logging change.

@pveentjer pveentjer merged commit 20ca0d8 into hazelcast:master Sep 20, 2016
@pveentjer pveentjer deleted the improvement/3.8/8893-partitioniterating-backup-diagnostics-more-detail branch September 20, 2016 10:01
@mmedenjak mmedenjak added the Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee label Apr 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee Team: Core Team: Performance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PartitionIteratingInfo more detail diagnostics
4 participants