Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility with the GHC 9.2 series #439

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Compatibility with the GHC 9.2 series #439

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ysangkok
Copy link
Contributor

This series ships with template-haskell version 2.18, which was previous
excluded by the bounds. The bounds have been bumped in this commit.

Also, this series has a new warning about defining superclasses in terms
of their subclasses. In this commit, we resolve the warning by moving
the definitions to the superclasses. Also, instead of duplicating a
mappend definition, we define it in terms of (<>) on its Semigroup
superclass.

This series ships with template-haskell version 2.18, which was previous
excluded by the bounds. The bounds have been bumped in this commit.

Also, this series has a new warning about defining superclasses in terms
of their subclasses. In this commit, we resolve the warning by moving
the definitions to the superclasses. Also, instead of duplicating a
`mappend` definition, we define it in terms of `(<>)` on its Semigroup
superclass.
@ysangkok
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, sorry, I hadn't thought there would be an existing PR for this. I'll close in favour of #436

@ysangkok ysangkok closed this Nov 29, 2021
@ysangkok ysangkok deleted the ghc-9.2-compat branch December 1, 2021 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant