HV-100

[hferentschik]

I think the basic harness is ready to get pulled in. The test need probably more work (refining existing tests, adding new ones). Looking for some feedback there.

Things should be described in the readme.md. Let me know whether things are unclear or do not work.

[gunnarmorling]

Does JMeter only support JUnit as testing framework? Or could we use TestNG here as well?

[hferentschik]

Only JUnit is supported. I would have preferred TestNG (mainly out of consistency) as well, but in this case some more dirty work is needed.

[hferentschik]

@gunnarmorling I removed the unnecessary commit and rebased everything

[gunnarmorling]

I think the harness is a great base for further tests. Especially I like the idea of the different profiles for the different versions, this allows for great comparing analyses.

How are your numbers for HV 4.2 vs. 4.3? The former is several times faster on my machine. I'm wondering what the reason is.

[gunnarmorling]

Ah I see, the improvements you mentioned are in the HV-538 branch; there the numbers look indeed much better.

[hferentschik]

How are your numbers for HV 4.2 vs. 4.3? The former is several times faster on my machine. I'm wondering what the reason is.

Mainly the SoftLimitMRUMap and the Contracts class. Things look much better on the HV-538 branch

Ah I see, the improvements you mentioned are in the HV-538 branch

:-) and looking much better again. we also don't have to shy the comparison with bval
If you think the changes for HV-538 are ok, I can create a pull request there as well

[gunnarmorling]

If you think the changes for HV-538 are ok, I can create a pull request there as well

I'm looking into this right now. the new map looks promising, I think it's similar to the one from Google Guava.