Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[rfc8659] CAA RR Change references to RFC 6844 to 8659. #1798

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 18, 2022

Conversation

darnuria
Copy link
Contributor

code was written here circa 2017, in 2019 rfc8659 was issued.

@darnuria
Copy link
Contributor Author

darnuria commented Oct 13, 2022

@djc opened the PR to have a starting point, have to read the whole monster also openned this issue #1799 to gather issue like #1794 and #1795

@darnuria darnuria force-pushed the rfc/rfc8659 branch 2 times, most recently from 9c02787 to 431995c Compare October 15, 2022 22:11
@darnuria
Copy link
Contributor Author

whops fill fix the links to point to https://tools.ietf.org/ and not datatracker.

RFC 8659 published in december 2019 fixed errata in 6844.
The Incident Object Description Exchange Format
[RFC7970](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7970)
@darnuria
Copy link
Contributor Author

@djc did an auto-review and found some incorrect link, also found that also The Incident Object Description Exchange Format were updated.

@darnuria darnuria marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2022 22:29
@djc djc merged commit 29eeef4 into hickory-dns:main Oct 18, 2022
@darnuria darnuria deleted the rfc/rfc8659 branch October 18, 2022 20:32
@darnuria
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants