Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release: v0.21.0 #79

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jan 13, 2022
Merged

release: v0.21.0 #79

merged 12 commits into from
Jan 13, 2022

Conversation

lgalabru
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

lgalabru and others added 12 commits January 6, 2022 16:22
chore: update develop branch
The filter annotation allows developers to tell the check-checker to
filter one or more inputs on an expression that cannot be detected as a
filter. This is useful when a check on some unrelated inputs indirectly
validates another input. For example:

```clarity
(define-public (withdraw (amount uint))
    (begin
        ;; #[filter(amount)]
        (asserts! (is-eq tx-sender (var-get admin)) (err u400))
        (stx-transfer? amount (as-contract tx-sender) tx-sender)
    )
)
```

The filter annotation takes either a comma-separated list of parameter
names to filter, or a '*', which filters everything.

Resolves #72
The GH_TOKEN secret is required for the semantic release step, but that
only runs on a PR to main. Since forks can open a PR to develop, which
needs to run the build and testing, but not the semantic release, we can
use the GITHUB_TOKEN instead. Fix from @CharlieC3.
fix: resolve CI failure for forks
Copy link
Member

@obycode obycode left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@lgalabru lgalabru merged commit 3edd064 into main Jan 13, 2022
@blockstack-devops
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.21.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants