You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have mostly stopped using parsyncfp (we haven't yet used version 2, for example) because we've switched mostly to cloud storage, which does not support rsync. We can connect to them with rclone (https://rclone.org), however, which is really similar as far as the command line, etc. goes. Do you imagine this would be possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be clearly be possible but it would require some reworking to
support and check all the options, etc.
I'm currently building a house, so I can't do anything before that. I can
look at anything before December.
I seem to remember that rclone uses a parallel approach anyway tho . Is
that not the case?
Harry
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, 2:17 AM Ryan Novosielski ***@***.***> wrote:
We have mostly stopped using parsyncfp (we haven't yet used version 2, for
example) because we've switched mostly to cloud storage, which does not
support rsync. We can connect to them with rclone (https://rclone.org),
however, which is really similar as far as the command line, etc. goes. Do
you imagine this would be possible?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AASF3Y6A7HEYA2YHIZAXYRTWC6LNBANCNFSM6AAAAAARD4WFII>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
The use of rclone and other transport mechanisms (netcat, UDR, etc) using pfp2's multiple spawn approach is on my TODO list, but far enough out that I'm not going to keep the issue open for now.
We have mostly stopped using parsyncfp (we haven't yet used version 2, for example) because we've switched mostly to cloud storage, which does not support rsync. We can connect to them with rclone (https://rclone.org), however, which is really similar as far as the command line, etc. goes. Do you imagine this would be possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: