Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relax binding strength for value sets (Michaela Ziegler, ahdis ag) #215

Closed
ig-feedback opened this issue May 5, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #216
Closed

Relax binding strength for value sets (Michaela Ziegler, ahdis ag) #215

ig-feedback opened this issue May 5, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #216

Comments

@ig-feedback
Copy link
Collaborator

ig-feedback commented May 5, 2023

ch.fhir.ig.ch-core#3.0.0 /StructureDefinition-ch-core-composition-epr.html

Relax the binding strength to extensible instead of required. If it is required, we are not able to use a newly introduced code, which isn't yet published in CH EPR Term.

  • for Composition EPR -> document type
  • and check all required bindings

Michaela Ziegler, ahdis ag

@ziegm ziegm changed the title Binding strength for document type (Michaela Ziegler, ahdis ag) Relax binding strength for value sets (Michaela Ziegler, ahdis ag) May 6, 2023
@ziegm ziegm self-assigned this May 6, 2023
ziegm added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2023
@ziegm ziegm linked a pull request May 7, 2023 that will close this issue
@ziegm
Copy link
Collaborator

ziegm commented May 7, 2023

Changed the binding to the ValueSets from required to extensible for the following elements (see ci build):

  • Composition
    • type
    • confidentiality
  • DocumentReference
    • type
    • category
    • context
      • facilityType
      • practiceSetting
  • Encounter
    • priority
    • hospitalization
      • extension:
        • BfsAdmitRole
        • BfsDischargeDecision
        • BfsDischargeDestination
      • admitSource
  • PractitionerRole
    • specialty
  • Patient
    • maritalStatus
  • Organization
    • type
  • All datatypes/extensions with eCH VS

@ziegm
Copy link
Collaborator

ziegm commented May 24, 2023

24.05.2023: FHIR Working Group agreed on the changes

@ziegm ziegm closed this as completed May 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants