New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PLATUI-2942: Upgrade library to govuk-frontend v5.3.0 #292
Conversation
26a510c
to
72b49aa
Compare
|
…from govuk-frontend v5.3.9
72b49aa
to
40f0c85
Compare
|
||
* Good, because it aligns our resources with current needs and reduces overhead. | ||
* Good, because it leaves room to adapt based on future demand. | ||
* Bad, because teams with immediate needs must find alternative solutions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM extra context on this is "where we think that it would not be too troublesome / intensive for people to implement the markup themselves if they need to because it's a standard input and button some extra classes and attributes"
edaf8f2
to
4eda4d5
Compare
|
} | ||
} | ||
@dataAttributes = @{ | ||
val maybeDataAttributes = ListMap( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we still need to use a ListMap here? The attrs as string OR map[string, string] is really confusing to work around - looks ok, feels like it's going to be worth seeing if we can do a better comparison when testing against output rendered by govuk stuff, can imagine more an more excluded / flakey tests 😵
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIRC ListMap
fixed some failing unit tests, and yes - it's awful 😅
3f3c459
to
21521f2
Compare
No description provided.