-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename "Core Roles" or "Core Circle Members" #149
Comments
What about "Structural Roles" for "Core Roles"? As these roles happen via & for the structure. |
What about "Required Roles" for "Core Roles" as those are the only roles On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Bernard Chiquet notifications@github.com
|
I would then suggest Core Structural Roles |
Do you like 'Anchor Roles' instead of Core Roles? These roles anchor the circle Beena Sent from my mobile device
|
I found it interesting that Core Roles is not mentioned in the Constitution and was very difficult to find any reference to this. for Core Circle Member: I believe that it would be more clear to designate someone as either a Minor Circle Member or Core Circle Member. |
Perhaps Constitutional Roles as they are are the roles required by the Constitution. Other Roles are just Roles. This then leave Core Circle Members intact as that certainly makes sense as compared with Other Members (in GlassFrog for example). It seems like it would be easier to explain. |
I like "Required Roles" (quite a bit) and "Constitutional Roles" (a bit less). I have also heard myself say "Holacracy Roles" sometimes (which is ugly :)). "Core Circle Members" works for me. |
"Core Roles" was apparently already removed from the constitution as a defined term, and no replacement is needed... :-) |
The use of "Core" in both "Core Roles" and "Core Circle Members" has confused some people as thinking this is the same/similar concept, when it's really not. Any ideas for an alternative term for one or the other?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: