Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose widgets visible property #2065

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2021
Merged

Expose widgets visible property #2065

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2021

Conversation

xavArtley
Copy link
Collaborator

fix #2052

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #2065 (32b3269) into master (709ef9b) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2065      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.42%   84.43%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         178      178              
  Lines       20636    20638       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        17421    17425       +4     
+ Misses       3215     3213       -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
panel/tests/test_reactive.py 98.90% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
panel/widgets/base.py 94.66% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
panel/io/reload.py 66.66% <0.00%> (+2.29%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 709ef9b...32b3269. Read the comment docs.

@philippjfr
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Do you know if all widgets support this properly?

@xavArtley
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No, but I suppose tests would have throw something if it wasn't available in bokeh properties

@philippjfr philippjfr merged commit ddf974d into master Mar 10, 2021
@philippjfr philippjfr deleted the xav/widget_visible branch March 10, 2021 18:18
@MarcSkovMadsen
Copy link
Collaborator

One big, but invisible step for man :-) Thanks @xavArtley

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Expose the visible attribute on widgets and indicators
3 participants