Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bidirectionally sync Tabulator.sorters #3217

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2022
Merged

Conversation

philippjfr
Copy link
Member

Previously we exposed sorters only so that remote pagination could correctly send the appropriate data but for consistency and ensuring that sorting persists when updating data we now always sync it bi-directionally.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 1, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3217 (ba5b1c2) into master (bc71dc7) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3217      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.15%   83.14%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         193      193              
  Lines       25716    25716              
==========================================
- Hits        21384    21382       -2     
- Misses       4332     4334       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
panel/io/reload.py 69.23% <0.00%> (-2.20%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bc71dc7...ba5b1c2. Read the comment docs.

@philippjfr philippjfr merged commit 67661b5 into master Mar 1, 2022
@philippjfr philippjfr deleted the tabulator_sorters branch March 1, 2022 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant